Search for: "Matter of Investigative Grand Jury Proceedings" Results 41 - 60 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2015, 2:14 pm
From Plaintiff’s perspective, the State’s counsel to the grand jury investigating Wilson differed markedly and in significant ways from the State’s counsel to the grand jury in the hundreds of matters presented to the grand jury earlier in its term. 21. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Helen Klein Murillo, Benjamin Wittes
Of course, we don’t know for sure that there is a grand jury proceeding to obstruct. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 6:31 am by Steven Boutwell
The Court did not accept the physician’s argument that the obstruction of justice statute does not extend to judicial proceedings such as a grand jury investigation. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 9:49 am by jadamengel
  In our experience, a defense lawyer experienced with grand jury investigations can influence the pre-indictment proceedings to the client’s advantage. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm by Hunter Biederman
The fact that this has leaked from a Grand Jury proceeding should send up red flags to everyone. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
The grand jury investigation, however, continues still. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:24 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Lykos portrays the grand jury proceedings as a witch hunt by her political enemies, and there is something to that assessment. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 9:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
A man moved for an examination of the stenographic minutes from a grand jury proceeding for the purpose of determining whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support the charge contained in the indictment and whether the legal instructions given to the grand jury were sufficient. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
How I came to sit on this jury was a matter of controversy to my friends and employers. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Even if you are not a target of a Grand Jury investigation or a case in Criminal or Supreme Court, an innocent mistake or an inconsistency in your testimony may have serious ramifications. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:35 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on September 8, 2011 released the following: "TUCSON, AZ-A federal grand jury returned a 21-count superseding indictment against Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agent Jovana Deas, 33, of Rio Rico, Arizona and Dana Maria Samaniego Montes, 40, of Agua Prieta, Mexico. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:35 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on September 8, 2011 released the following: "TUCSON, AZ-A federal grand jury returned a 21-count superseding indictment against Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agent Jovana Deas, 33, of Rio Rico, Arizona and Dana Maria Samaniego Montes, 40, of Agua Prieta, Mexico. [read post]
30 May 2014, 11:31 am
A New York Criminal Lawyer said the grand jury of April 1975 submitted four reports to the court concerning four separate investigations. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:14 pm by Allan Blutstein
If I am trying to confirm the impanelment of a federal grand jury on a particular matter, would I be able to FOIA the DOJ or the FBI for records related to the case? [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:12 am by Susan Brenner
A distinctive characteristic of grand jury investigations is that everything that occurs in the grand jury must be kept secret by those that are privy to its proceedings, i.e., the grand jurors, the prosecutor, an interpreter if a witness needs one and a court reporter who transcribes the proceedings. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Daniel Perlman
If a case does go to grand jury, the prosecutor will go in front of a grand jury to ask the grand jury to indict an accused. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:53 am
The court decided that the Watergate-era step had been lawful because it could be interpreted as falling under an exception authorizing disclosure of grand jury material “in connection with a judicial proceeding. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:56 am by Ashwin Phatak
Trump has fought the grand jury subpoena in federal court, arguing that he enjoys an absolute immunity from criminal process that is so sweeping that it prevents a third party like Mazars from complying with a preindictment grand jury subpoena—simply because the matters under investigation pertain to the president. [read post]