Search for: "Matter of Kelly" Results 1 - 20 of 2,811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2024, 4:06 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
Hamed Aleaziz, Zolan Kanno-Youngs, and Kate Kelly report for The New York Times; Avery Lotz reports for Axios. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 8:06 am by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
” The recent Loper Bright decision overturning Chevron has invited much discussion on whether decisions made The post Lynn L Bergeson, Kelly N Garson, “Loper Bright and TSCA: Will the demise of Chevron matter? [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 8:06 am by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
” The recent Loper Bright decision overturning Chevron has invited much discussion on whether decisions made The post Lynn L Bergeson, Kelly N Garson, “Loper Bright and TSCA: Will the demise of Chevron matter? [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Section 11 of the 2024 Act prevents members from the Permanent Defence Force from (i) making, without prior authorisation, a public statement or comment, or (ii) attending a protest, in relation to a political matter or matter of Government policy; as well as (iii) canvassing for any political organisation or (iv) addressing a meeting of a political organisation. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
A testimony to this is her ‘brat generator’, an online tool allowing users to create custom images resembling the album cover of ‘brat’.All the above said, it is understandable that the ‘brat’ era’s subject matter from an IP perspective cannot be confined to the music, the cover’s colour, or its intentionally lo-res Arial Narrow font; it is a mixture of all these elements that are inextricably linked. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 2:34 pm by David Klein
“Chevron deference” refers to the 1984 landmark Supreme Court ruling in the matter of Chevron v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm by John Elwood
Paxton, 23-1122Issue: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech, instead of strict scrutiny as this court and other circuits have consistently done. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm by Seeger Weiss
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:44 am by Rob Robinson
Editor’s Note: June 2024 saw significant developments in eDiscovery, cybersecurity, and information governance. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
The quality of the arguments available to Trump’s lawyers will surely matter at least some of the time. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Muskogee County, Okla. employee claims he is fired in retaliation for his perceived speech about some matters of public concern and that he did not actually say the things he was fired for. [read post]