Search for: "Matter of Levinson" Results 1 - 20 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 7:14 am by JB
CSPAN recently interviewed Sandy Levinson about his 1988 book, Constitutional Faith.And here is a lecture Sandy gave in Cambridge, Massachusetts entitled: Renewing Democracy: How Much Do Elections Matter? [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:30 am
There appears to be no other explanation than party loyalty for the Republican's unwillingness even to allow a vote on the matter. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 10:23 am
Jack Balkin (Yale Law school) and Sanford Levinson (Texas Law School) have posted Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship, 18 Yale J. of Law & the Humanities 155 (2006) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:15 pm
Master of the Blog Balkin has encouraged me to post some comments I prepared for the "schmooze" on Sandy Levinson's book. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 6:17 am
Professors Jack Balkin (Yale) and Sanford Levinson (U of Texas) have posted "Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship" (Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 121; U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 109, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities Vol. 18, p. 155, 2006) on SSRN. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 9:10 pm by Patent Docs
Orlando Lopez of Burns & Levinson LLP will cover the following topics: • Overview on Subject Matter Eligibility • The December 2014 Interim Patent Eligibility Guidance • July 2015 Updated Guidance • Subject Matter Eligibility for Natural Phenomena, Diagnostic Method and Software Patents • Recent Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Litigations -- McRO v. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 4:16 pm
Sandy Levinson has an interesting post on a speech made by New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse and the reactions it provoked. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 1:37 pm by Justin Levitt
Jessica Levinson forecasts coming confusion in California, a heavily absentee-voting state where voters have now been trained on a “top two” state primary (in which voters can vote on all candidates, no matter their party registration). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm by Lindsay Stafford Mader
Ruling against these bans is what “everybody expects the court to do,” Levinson said, noting that the real question has always been why the court decided to take up the matter at this time. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
So, as a matter of sheer historical accuracy, Scalia was probably wrong in suggesting that the Second Amendment had anything to do with safeguarding a right of self-defense. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
Matters seem to be quite different when policies go poorly. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am by David Pozen
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:23 am
The Jack Balkin (our generous host) who, along with Sandy Levinson, articulates a descriptive theory of the development of constitutional law as largely a matter of "partisan entrenchment" appears to be in tension with the Jack Balkin who is building a version of originalism as a prescriptive theory of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:10 am
Finally, my own personal experience as an entry-level differed from Levinson's view that that it matters to schools "not at all" what law firm (if any) you worked at. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by JB
LaCroix, The Invention of the Archival ConstitutionMark Graber, Fixation as a Constitutional RhetoricSanford Levinson, Our inevitably living ConstitutionWilliam Baude, Were the framers originalists (and does it matter)? [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:51 am
  That structural defect is present no matter which party is in control of the political branches. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:50 am
  That structural defect is present no matter which party is in control of the political branches. [read post]