Search for: "Matter of Levinson"
Results 1 - 20
of 458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2010, 7:14 am
CSPAN recently interviewed Sandy Levinson about his 1988 book, Constitutional Faith.And here is a lecture Sandy gave in Cambridge, Massachusetts entitled: Renewing Democracy: How Much Do Elections Matter? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:02 am
The Court in essence ruled that hate speech, no matter how offensive and intentionally hurtful, is protected if it addresses a matter of public concern in a public place. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:30 am
There appears to be no other explanation than party loyalty for the Republican's unwillingness even to allow a vote on the matter. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 10:23 am
Jack Balkin (Yale Law school) and Sanford Levinson (Texas Law School) have posted Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship, 18 Yale J. of Law & the Humanities 155 (2006) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:15 pm
Master of the Blog Balkin has encouraged me to post some comments I prepared for the "schmooze" on Sandy Levinson's book. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 6:17 am
Professors Jack Balkin (Yale) and Sanford Levinson (U of Texas) have posted "Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship" (Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 121; U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 109, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities Vol. 18, p. 155, 2006) on SSRN. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:12 pm
Why Does the Definition Matter? [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:06 pm
Levinson, a law professor and Director of the Culture and Jury Project at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, and Robert J. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 4:16 pm
Sandy Levinson has an interesting post on a speech made by New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse and the reactions it provoked. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 4:36 am
Sandy Levinson, always an astute observer of American politics, writes:And, of course, it is no small matter that Mr. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm
Ruling against these bans is what “everybody expects the court to do,” Levinson said, noting that the real question has always been why the court decided to take up the matter at this time. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:44 pm
Levinson resigned from its board of directors. [read post]
8 May 2008, 10:03 pm
For example, see the posts of Brian Tamanaha and Sandy Levinson. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:39 pm
Levinson, “THERE’S NO PLACE LIKE HOME”: SUPER-SIZING THE STATE CONSTITUTION’S BILL OF RIGHTS, 15 Lewis & Clark Law Review 773 (2011) Though the subject matter of Constitutional Law with respect to civil liberties once consisted almost exclusively of a study of the Untied States Supreme Court’s jurisprudence regarding the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, [...] [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
So, as a matter of sheer historical accuracy, Scalia was probably wrong in suggesting that the Second Amendment had anything to do with safeguarding a right of self-defense. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 6:32 am
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment . [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 1:32 pm
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:41 am
Heller matters a lot. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
Matters seem to be quite different when policies go poorly. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]