Search for: "Matter of Levinson" Results 21 - 40 of 487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
Matters seem to be quite different when policies go poorly. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am by David Pozen
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It’s arguable that the votes for ghost candidates in Districts 9 and 39 didn’t matter electorally. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:23 am
The Jack Balkin (our generous host) who, along with Sandy Levinson, articulates a descriptive theory of the development of constitutional law as largely a matter of "partisan entrenchment" appears to be in tension with the Jack Balkin who is building a version of originalism as a prescriptive theory of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:10 am
Finally, my own personal experience as an entry-level differed from Levinson's view that that it matters to schools "not at all" what law firm (if any) you worked at. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by JB
LaCroix, The Invention of the Archival ConstitutionMark Graber, Fixation as a Constitutional RhetoricSanford Levinson, Our inevitably living ConstitutionWilliam Baude, Were the framers originalists (and does it matter)? [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:50 am
  That structural defect is present no matter which party is in control of the political branches. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:51 am
  That structural defect is present no matter which party is in control of the political branches. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
SeeSANFORD LEVINSON, CONSTITUTIONAL FAITH 3-8 (1988); Sanford Levinson & J.M. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
To what extent does the hard-wired constitution matter for these system-wide considerations? [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 9:05 am
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by SeckAdmin
In the latest episode of the Counsel to Counsel podcast, I speak with Lisa Cukier, a partner at the law firm Burns and Levinson in Boston. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:25 am by Walter Olson
… The chief barrier to overturning Basic may not be its logic, its wisdom, or even its correctness as a matter of law, but instead stare decisis. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[5] Sandy suggests that this is no laughing matter. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 9:53 am
Among other sessions, I will quickly blog about a panel currently going on, being moderated by Ron Friedmann with partners from Goldberg Kohn, Kelley Drye and Burns & Levinson. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:50 am by JB
For example, if Justice Kagan were recused on a particular matter, the tenth most junior Justice in years of service (David Souter, who under this plan would not have needed to retire) would replace her. [read post]