Search for: "Matter of Levinson" Results 21 - 40 of 458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It’s arguable that the votes for ghost candidates in Districts 9 and 39 didn’t matter electorally. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:23 am
The Jack Balkin (our generous host) who, along with Sandy Levinson, articulates a descriptive theory of the development of constitutional law as largely a matter of "partisan entrenchment" appears to be in tension with the Jack Balkin who is building a version of originalism as a prescriptive theory of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:10 am
Finally, my own personal experience as an entry-level differed from Levinson's view that that it matters to schools "not at all" what law firm (if any) you worked at. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by JB
LaCroix, The Invention of the Archival ConstitutionMark Graber, Fixation as a Constitutional RhetoricSanford Levinson, Our inevitably living ConstitutionWilliam Baude, Were the framers originalists (and does it matter)? [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:50 am
  That structural defect is present no matter which party is in control of the political branches. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:51 am
  That structural defect is present no matter which party is in control of the political branches. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
SeeSANFORD LEVINSON, CONSTITUTIONAL FAITH 3-8 (1988); Sanford Levinson & J.M. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
To what extent does the hard-wired constitution matter for these system-wide considerations? [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 9:05 am
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:25 am by Walter Olson
… The chief barrier to overturning Basic may not be its logic, its wisdom, or even its correctness as a matter of law, but instead stare decisis. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[5] Sandy suggests that this is no laughing matter. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 9:53 am
Among other sessions, I will quickly blog about a panel currently going on, being moderated by Ron Friedmann with partners from Goldberg Kohn, Kelley Drye and Burns & Levinson. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:50 am by JB
For example, if Justice Kagan were recused on a particular matter, the tenth most junior Justice in years of service (David Souter, who under this plan would not have needed to retire) would replace her. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 11:23 am by Heather K. Gerken
  But it doesn’t matter how many trump cards you hold if you are playing in a hurricane. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Participants include such classics as John Hart Ely’s Democracy and Distrust, Ronald Dworkin’s Taking Rights Seriously, Gerald Gunther’s Constitutional Law, and, for that matter, Sandy Levinson’s Constitutional Faith and Jack Balkin’s Constitutional Redemption. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:01 pm
("A week before that March 11th deadline, I had a private meeting with the attorney general for an hour, just the two of us, and I laid out for him what we had learned and what our analysis was in this particular matter. [read post]