Search for: "Matter of Levinson"
Results 61 - 80
of 480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2022, 9:33 am
Many times, however, the truth of the matter is that the real reason the fee request is large is because the defense team did an excellent job, forcing plaintiff’s counsel to invest many hours to win the case. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Levinson and I describe three ways this might happen. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 6:28 pm
" Harvard law professor Mark Tushnet, like Levinson, has studied the 2nd Amendment. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:49 am
Since Sandy Levinson and Mark Graber passed the baton to us in the fall of 2012, we have endeavored to carry forward the interdisciplinary conversation that they envisioned. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
One of Sandy Levinson’s virtues as a scholar, writer, and person, is that he’s less than indifferent to this idea of what scholarship is about. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:28 pm
Illinois ballot access is a matter of Illinois law, not federal law. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:37 am
(Here is one of the more reasonable reactions, from Sandy Levinson.) [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 8:30 am
Text may matter. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
If these different groups of respondents rate the proposal differently, then how it was pursued matters. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:30 pm
Making matters worse, if the prior felony conviction was also an Unlawful Surveillance the crime is raised to New York Penal Law 250.50. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
Levinson/Graber models interpretation as translation. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 1:59 am
These issues came up again in the case of Levinson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
Levinson. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 11:41 am
(Sandy Levinson discusses the article, too, nearby.) [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
Levinson. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 9:11 am
If I'm out on a limb here, I don't think I'm alone on that limb: Sandy Levinson has made some similar observations. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:59 am
David BeattyAt the end of their dialogue on the theory and structure of the U.S. constitution Randy Barnett and Sandy Levinson raise an interesting point. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:49 am
Presumably this would mean that states now must, as a constitutional matter, have a doctrine of self-defense in their criminal and tort laws. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 11:53 am
Below is an op-ed article in reply to that of Sandy Levinson that appeared Sunday, Feb. 7, in the Austin American-Statesman. [read post]
