Search for: "Matter of Levinson"
Results 141 - 160
of 480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
12 May 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
9 May 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
We also discuss important differences between the more ideological Republican party and the more constituent-driven Democratic party; these differences are critical in understanding Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese’s transformative role in shaping legal policy through his embrace of the then-fledgling Federalist Society (an observation that is prominently featured in Sandy Levinson’s and Jack Balkin’s posts). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
That would ensure that the Court would almost never rule against any significant initiative of the party in power, no matter how dangerous and unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
LaCroix, The Invention of the Archival ConstitutionMark Graber, Fixation as a Constitutional RhetoricSanford Levinson, Our inevitably living ConstitutionWilliam Baude, Were the framers originalists (and does it matter)? [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:22 pm
For any belief, no matter how crazy or off the wall, there’s likely someone who believes it. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
They displayed an “openness” (again drawing on Levinson) that confounds our expectations. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:15 am
(We never want to be too reductive, but Levinson’s invocation of “motivated reasoning” certainly seems relevant here.) [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Framers designing a constitution must decide between provisions likely capable of only one interpretation that will become part of what Sandy Levinson calls the Constitution of Settlement or provisions whose interpretation will be disputed that will become part of what Sandy Levinson calls the Constitution of Conversation. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 8:48 pm
But, right now, it doesn't really matter what I think. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
Among American legal scholars, Sandy Levinson has seen the future. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:15 am
Levinson, Abbe Gluck, Richard Epstein, and Ilya Shapiro. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:06 am
“This issue is a significant matter and requires the FDA’s immediate attention. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am
” Briefly: At the Brennan Center for Justice, Rachel Levinson-Waldman writes that Carpenter v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 8:28 am
This clause is—one might have thought—part of what Sandy Levinson calls the hard-wired constitution of settlement. [read post]
