Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 181 - 200
of 16,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2012, 6:02 pm
After all, the release at JFK marked the second time, in a matter of months, that Awlaki wriggled free despite the heavy cloud of 9/11 suspicion that hovered over him.” [read post]
24 May 2020, 11:21 pm
FIRST DEFENSE (word) – judgment of 29 November 2012 (cases T-537/10 and T-538/10): and FAGUMIT (word) vs. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:30 pm
Mark D. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:42 pm
We don't deal with FDA regulatory matters that often, and with the criminal side even less,... [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:56 am
GL couldn’t find any authority holding that patent marks can’t be displayed when a product is used in a manner potentially not covered by the patents. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 2:27 pm
Size Matters For Trademarks On ClothingTypically the smaller and more discrete a mark is used on clothing, the more likely the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:25 am
via hotair.com I don't think it matters. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:18 am
Earlier today, the General Court (GC) issued a keenly-awaited ruling (T‑307/17), in which it upheld the earlier decision of the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal (R 1515/2016-2), and found this three-stripe EU trade mark (EUTM) owned by adidas:invalid. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:11 pm
Just because someone or something (like a saying) is “famous” doesn’t mean it’s fair game for all to use as a mark. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 6:25 am
The post What is Chain of Custody & Why it Matters? [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
Standard of review matters. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm
SThe matter of inconsistency arose:Finally, no matter the government’s interest, it cannotmeet the fourth prong of Central Hudson. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
by Mark A. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 12:44 pm
"This is the latest appeal in a longstanding, particularly acrimonious probate matter involving the Mark Hughes Family Trust (trust). . . . [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
by Mark A. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
by Mark A. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
Article 3(1)(f) of Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 provides that"(f) trade marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality"shall not be registered, and 15 U.S.C. para 1052(a) of the Lanham Act in the USA provides that registration shall be refused to a mark which"Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living… [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:18 am
The mark has to be assessed in its entirety as a matter of immediate impression to the aforementioned consumer. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:18 am
The mark has to be assessed in its entirety as a matter of immediate impression to the aforementioned consumer. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 1:34 am
But don't worry, you can relive the experience via a series of reports on the different discussions. [read post]
