Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 181 - 200
of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 12:10 am
This Kat recalls that this is not his friend's first foray into slightly mischievous trade mark matters. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:30 am
Happy to be here Mark. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:09 pm
shows is that context matters: "Would it help? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Don't get me wrong: I welcome review and reform of family justice, as I've stated here many times previously. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
Specifically, according to the Guidelines "[t]he applicant must remove any inconsistencies by amending the description either by deleting the inconsistent embodiments or marking appropriately so that it is clear that they do not fall within the subject-matter for which protection is sought" (F-IV-4.3). [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:02 pm
The test for confusion is whether, as a matter of “first impression in the mind of a causal consumer somewhat in a hurry who sees the [mark] at a time when he or she has no more than an imperfect recollection of the [prior] trade-mark, and does not pause to give the matter any detailed consideration or scrutiny, nor to examine closely the similarities and differences between the marks”. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
Ellen, welcome to Antitrust Matters. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Elsewhere it won’t be changing either because the Member State isn’t interested or it can’t legally change. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 2:05 am
“Can’t remember”. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:02 pm
After all, the release at JFK marked the second time, in a matter of months, that Awlaki wriggled free despite the heavy cloud of 9/11 suspicion that hovered over him.” [read post]
24 May 2020, 11:21 pm
FIRST DEFENSE (word) – judgment of 29 November 2012 (cases T-537/10 and T-538/10): and FAGUMIT (word) vs. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:42 pm
We don't deal with FDA regulatory matters that often, and with the criminal side even less,... [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:30 pm
Mark D. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:56 am
GL couldn’t find any authority holding that patent marks can’t be displayed when a product is used in a manner potentially not covered by the patents. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 2:27 pm
Size Matters For Trademarks On ClothingTypically the smaller and more discrete a mark is used on clothing, the more likely the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:25 am
via hotair.com I don't think it matters. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:11 pm
Just because someone or something (like a saying) is “famous” doesn’t mean it’s fair game for all to use as a mark. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:18 am
Earlier today, the General Court (GC) issued a keenly-awaited ruling (T‑307/17), in which it upheld the earlier decision of the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal (R 1515/2016-2), and found this three-stripe EU trade mark (EUTM) owned by adidas:invalid. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
Standard of review matters. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm
SThe matter of inconsistency arose:Finally, no matter the government’s interest, it cannotmeet the fourth prong of Central Hudson. [read post]
