Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 201 - 220 of 16,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
Article 3(1)(f) of Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 provides that"(f) trade marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality"shall not be registered, and 15 U.S.C. para 1052(a) of the Lanham Act in the USA provides that registration shall be refused to a mark which"Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 1:34 am
  But don't worry, you can relive the experience via a series of reports on the different discussions. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 2:32 am
I don’t know what happened then, nor who makes up this committee, but they are obviously important if the President talks compromise with them. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:18 am by Jani Ihalainen
The mark has to be assessed in its entirety as a matter of immediate impression to the aforementioned consumer. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:18 am by Jani Ihalainen
The mark has to be assessed in its entirety as a matter of immediate impression to the aforementioned consumer. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:07 am
  And it doesn't matter if the franchise agreement provides that it terminates on bankruptcy or insolvency. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:52 pm by Glo
As a matter of fact, 18-wheelers suffer from a whole host of safety issues. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:38 am
What happens, as a matter of trade mark law, if that descriptive element is factually inaccurate with respect to the underlying goods or services? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:08 am
Whether or not this is the case, however, the underlying fact is that the trade mark practitioner will likely find himself working with the company's CFO or the like with respect to trade mark matters. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:21 pm
Chandler has no credibility in this matter. [read post]
Comment The judgment shows that reputed trade marks will not always be spared from revocation, and that in the assessment of trade mark use, it matters how customers view the products. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 7:44 am by Jamison Koehler
  It doesn’t matter if the prevailing version sounds like Archie Bunker’s story or his son-in-law’s. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 11:14 am
Why didn’t Shurtleff contact Sam directly in regard to this matter? [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 11:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
As a matter of practice, this is often required by the USPTO since ‘Hollywood’ is not a distinctive word. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
As a legal matter, therefore, the contemplated change would require an amendment to the current Indian trade mark law. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:09 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
And the legal issue is one that I have researched in the past, and I know that there are different positions in two other Circuits and that the 9th Circuit hasn't ruled on the matter. [read post]