Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 221 - 240
of 16,305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2010, 1:16 pm
The IPKat's friend Edward Smith writes to ask him to alert his trade mark-owning readers (and their advisers) to a matter which requires their urgent attention. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 4:24 pm
But consent obtained by officers isn’t always consent, no matter how it’s portrayed in police reports and court testimony. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
Under “dilution by tarnishment,” the third party associates the famous mark with inappropriate or unflattering subject matter. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:51 am
In the Matter of Mark T. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
The answer, began Mann J, was that it “is a matter of construction of the letter in question” – 10/10 if you wrote that. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
Whether this should be the case is a matter for discussion. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:11 pm
The use of "sensibly" in Judge Hacon's judgements is itself becoming something of a trade mark. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:29 am
As Mr Justice Arnold said in paragraph 1 "[t]he case raises important issues of European trade mark law", which necessitates references to the CJEU on issues relating to (i) bad faith for filing with no intention to use and (ii) IP TRANSLATOR clarity issues. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
A shareholder can also withhold authority by not signing a proxy card (although this would withhold authority to vote on all matters). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:38 am
The reasons for this were, in particular, that the subject-matter disclosed on page 9, line 23 to page 10, line 18, was "broader than the subject-matter of the allowable claim [sic] claim 17 which concerns the expression vector of the invention" and "[i]t cannot be interpreted that this passage concerns an embodiment which would be a dependent claim of claim 17". [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:47 am
Judge Folsom started by noting that Orvis had withdrawn its motion to dismiss claiming that no false marking occurred and that the complaint didn't meet minimum pleading standards, accordingly it was denied without prejudice. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
For example in Hypen GmbH v EU IPO, Case T-146/15 the General Court held that, taking into account the intrinsic qualities and the greater or lesser degree of distinctive character of the mark, a circle around the mark in question was not sufficient to alter the distinctive character of the mark.Lets look at it this way.... [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:48 am
And some of them inevitably show up in the comments on Grits whenever they're mentioned to flame them for all they haven't done. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:00 pm
and didn’t show loss of sales, goodwill or ability to market that was caused by the false marking. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:25 am
“And that’s because the human condition isn’t all that different, back then or now. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:08 am
Here are a few: First, don’t read too much into this. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:16 am
"[I]t is clear that [plaintiff] anticipated that a motion to transfer these types of cases would be filed. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
It is true that none of the devices shown in the figures of document D14 is marked as “figure 9”. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:12 am
Some lawyers say that typography doesn't matter, but Butterick says they don't really believe that. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
In its controversial ruling in Case C-530/12, OHIM v National Lottery Commission [extensively reported by the IPKat here],the focus was on the probative value of national law: does it need to be considered by OHIM and by the General Court as a matter of fact or as a matter of law? [read post]
