Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 261 - 280
of 16,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 7:29 pm
by Kevin Jon Heller The following is a guest-post by Mark Kersten. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:09 pm
The IPKat's post on Friday ("When 'genuine' isn't genuine", here) has attracted a lot of interest. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:28 am
It is not executed by the bank or Mark III. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
As Kitchin LJ said in Maier v ASOS [2015]EWCA Civ 220, the key question is "whether the use that Asos has made of the sign ASOS has been in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:09 pm
This marks Republicans’ largest confidence advantage since May 2018. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:47 am
The court’s concern is for situations where the defendant puts the symbol at issue in the place on a work where a trademark goes as a matter of convention. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:51 am
Though the AIA did change false marking law, that wasn’t the “major objective” of the law, which was focused on first-to-file. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA ___________________________________ REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT __________________________________ MARK S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:44 am
Mark Britton of AVVO frequently says that "if you are not on the internet, you don't exist. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:44 am
Mark Britton of AVVO frequently says that "if you are not on the internet, you don't exist. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:54 am
Claiming likelihood of confusion with their many Stylized SAN FRANCISCO marks, the Bay Area Batsmen are opposing registration of the mark shown immediately below, for "Aprons; Bandanas; Caps; Hooded sweatshirts; Jackets; Sweat shirts; T-shirts. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, A 84 (EPC 1973) together with R 29 (EPC 1973) requires a claim to give all the essential features that are necessary for defining the invention.This requirements has also been affirmed in decision G 1/07 [4.2.2; 3.3.1 – should read 4.3.1]. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
See TMEP § 1213.03(a) (“If a mark is comprised in part of matter that, as applied to the goods or services, is generic or does not function as a mark, the matter must be disclaimed to permit registration on the Principal Register (including registration under §2(f) of the Act) or on the Supplemental Register. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
It’s a very serious matter because this is evidence of wrongdoing. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 11:33 am
And the set of cases reaching a Federal Circuit disposition tells us little about cases that settle or aren't appealed or in which subject-matter issues aren't raised. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:54 am
One should expect a Section 2(e)(1) descriptiveness refusal if one uses the applied-for mark in one's identification of goods, shouldn't one? [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 5:30 am
This won’t matter to you, as you don’t have to be him, to live his life, to suffer his misery. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
The post Engagement Matters: How to Measure It Effectively appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 5:08 am
That section prohibits registration of marks that comprise immoral or scandalous matter (such as profanity), or marks that are disparaging (such as racial slurs). [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:52 am
The applicant in this matter was CKL Holdings NV, a Dutch company which is owned and controlled by Mr Michael Gleissner. [read post]
