Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 261 - 280 of 15,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 4:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court’s concern is for situations where the defendant puts the symbol at issue in the place on a work where a trademark goes as a matter of convention. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA ___________________________________ REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT __________________________________ MARK S. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
As Kitchin LJ said in Maier v ASOS [2015]EWCA Civ 220, the key question is "whether the use that Asos has made of the sign ASOS has been in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:44 am by Cheryl Leone
Mark Britton of AVVO frequently says that "if you are not on the internet, you don't exist. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:44 am by Cheryl Leone
Mark Britton of AVVO frequently says that "if you are not on the internet, you don't exist. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:54 am by John L. Welch
Claiming likelihood of confusion with their many Stylized SAN FRANCISCO marks, the Bay Area Batsmen are opposing registration of the mark shown immediately below, for "Aprons; Bandanas; Caps; Hooded sweatshirts; Jackets; Sweat shirts; T-shirts. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, A 84 (EPC 1973) together with R 29 (EPC 1973) requires a claim to give all the essential features that are necessary for defining the invention.This requirements has also been affirmed in decision G 1/07 [4.2.2; 3.3.1 – should read 4.3.1]. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
See TMEP § 1213.03(a) (“If a mark is comprised in part of matter that, as applied to the goods or services, is generic or does not function as a mark, the matter must be disclaimed to permit registration on the Principal Register (including registration under §2(f) of the Act) or on the Supplemental Register. [read post]
The post Engagement Matters: How to Measure It Effectively appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 11:33 am by Lisa Ouellette
And the set of cases reaching a Federal Circuit disposition tells us little about cases that settle or aren't appealed or in which subject-matter issues aren't raised. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 11:33 am by Lisa Ouellette
And the set of cases reaching a Federal Circuit disposition tells us little about cases that settle or aren't appealed or in which subject-matter issues aren't raised. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 5:08 am by Wes Anderson
That section prohibits registration of marks that comprise immoral or scandalous matter (such as profanity), or marks that are disparaging (such as racial slurs). [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:16 am by Stewart Baker
It’s a very serious matter because this is evidence of wrongdoing. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 5:30 am by SHG
This won’t matter to you, as you don’t have to be him, to live his life, to suffer his misery. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:54 am
One should expect a Section 2(e)(1) descriptiveness refusal if one uses the applied-for mark in one's identification of goods, shouldn't one? [read post]
20 May 2007, 12:33 pm
Channeling Mark Twain/Samuel Clemens and Sonny Bono, Mark Helprin asserts that IP *is* property, and should be treated accordingly — no matter what the price: A Great Idea Lives Forever. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 12:00 pm
Although his gut instinct was that any site clearly won't be that of the trade mark owner and so no confusion (unless we go down the initial interest confusion route), he thinks this is probably the elusive example of a mark which is different to the earlier mark, but in a way that consumers won't notice (otherwise they wouldn't have typed it by mistake), rendering it deemed to be identical under the LTJ Diffusion test. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:03 am by Peter Groves
Co-existence involving a UK trade mark can't amount to co-existence outside the UK. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:52 am
  The applicant in this matter was CKL Holdings NV, a Dutch company which is owned and controlled by Mr Michael Gleissner. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:37 pm by Michael Atkins
It would not matter that you started using your mark first and have superior trademark rights. [read post]