Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 281 - 300
of 16,556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2009, 2:54 am
One should expect a Section 2(e)(1) descriptiveness refusal if one uses the applied-for mark in one's identification of goods, shouldn't one? [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 5:30 am
This won’t matter to you, as you don’t have to be him, to live his life, to suffer his misery. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 5:08 am
That section prohibits registration of marks that comprise immoral or scandalous matter (such as profanity), or marks that are disparaging (such as racial slurs). [read post]
20 May 2007, 12:33 pm
Channeling Mark Twain/Samuel Clemens and Sonny Bono, Mark Helprin asserts that IP *is* property, and should be treated accordingly — no matter what the price: A Great Idea Lives Forever. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 11:24 am
" Now of course one might argue that intent doesn't matter here, and certain speech should be removed from Facebook regardless of the speaker's intent. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:52 am
The applicant in this matter was CKL Holdings NV, a Dutch company which is owned and controlled by Mr Michael Gleissner. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:03 am
Co-existence involving a UK trade mark can't amount to co-existence outside the UK. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:30 am
The relationship between the applicant’s mark and the subject matter or purpose of the goods and services in question were therefore sufficiently direct to render the word mark descriptive of those goods and services, in spite of the fact that the relevant public did not know how the meditation was practised or what the method used exactly consisted of. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 12:00 pm
Although his gut instinct was that any site clearly won't be that of the trade mark owner and so no confusion (unless we go down the initial interest confusion route), he thinks this is probably the elusive example of a mark which is different to the earlier mark, but in a way that consumers won't notice (otherwise they wouldn't have typed it by mistake), rendering it deemed to be identical under the LTJ Diffusion test. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:37 pm
It would not matter that you started using your mark first and have superior trademark rights. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
§ 1127) as follows:[T]he bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:15 am
how many days on average did it take us to conclude each matter? [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 2:42 pm
Yes, service matters. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 10:10 am
Personally, I find it difficult to take a side in this matter. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
See Mark A. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 10:34 am
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Brian T. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:54 pm
Mark it. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 2:05 am
For instance, readers might recall the bad luck of Cardi B’s trade mark application for the word mark “OKURRR” (see here). [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:17 am
Consumers, therefore, wouldn't necessarily understand the mark to automatically mean the provision of hotel booking services. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:17 am
Consumers, therefore, wouldn't necessarily understand the mark to automatically mean the provision of hotel booking services. [read post]
