Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 401 - 420 of 16,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 7:55 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
The subtitle of the book, Advice about Lawyering, In-House and Out, That Only the Internet Could Provide fairly sums up its subject matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
[T]he Lanham Act permits registration of marks that champion society’s sense of rectitude and morality, but not marks that denigrate those concepts. . . . [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 10:12 am by Lisa Ouellette
As a matter of current doctrine, stronger marks receive a broader scope of protection. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 10:12 am by Lisa Ouellette
As a matter of current doctrine, stronger marks receive a broader scope of protection. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:28 am
The Board's finding of fact was a matter of fact, not of law, and was not admissible on an appeal to the CJEU. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:58 am by BLOG
Facebook Inc. will probably put off its initial public offering until 2012, giving Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg more time to gain users and boost sales, three people familiar with the matter said. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The word mark was allegedly removed before the goods were shipped in commerce (which wouldn’t matter anyway, under Dastar). [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Certification marks can’t be used by certifying entity, and as a pragmatic matter most orgs had similarity b/t mark and organization name. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 1:42 am by Sean Hayes
If you don’t want the added cost of litigating a matter in a Korean court, please register your trademark in Korea. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:29 pm
The DPMA (see IPKat report here) decided in the BSGE's favour and invalidated the mark, according to media reports, the DPMA found that "Neuschwanstein" was an "often used", non-distinctive term" and thus not capable to indicate trade origin of the goods and services marketed under the sign.The German Federal Patent Court has now decided this matter and issued a press release confirming that it has upheld the DPMA's decision to cancel the… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
AT&T Techs., Inc., 789 F.2d 1518 (11th Cir. 1986); Silas v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
After a rejection most recently by the EUIPO General Court, the matter has moved for determination by the CJEU, with the AG issuing their opinion ahead of the decision.Under Article 52(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Regulation, an application can be declared invalid if the applicant was acting in bad faith when filing the application. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
After a rejection most recently by the EUIPO General Court, the matter has moved for determination by the CJEU, with the AG issuing their opinion ahead of the decision.Under Article 52(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Regulation, an application can be declared invalid if the applicant was acting in bad faith when filing the application. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court first found that “overhead” is generic as a matter of law: it is the common name of the general category of goods or services. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a policy matter, a single color product design mark is much more problematic for competition than a multi-color product packaging mark is. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
It took me half the year, but today marks the end of my list of Top 10 Mistakes in Arguing on Appeal to the BPAI. [read post]