Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 461 - 480 of 16,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
(Note that the certification mark can also be protected under Lanham Act § 43(a), as a matter of common law, even without a registration.)Ideally, everyone is made better off by this system. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:41 am by Michael Madison
” I put “leadership” in quotation marks because what “leadership development” and “leadership education” mean in law schools and the legal profession is as multi-faceted as it is important. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]APPENDIX A IN THE CIRCUIT COURTOF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIALCIRCUIT IN AND FOR BREVARDCOUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 05-1991-7249-AXXXSTATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, o MARK DEAN SCHWAB, r Defendant. --------------~/ ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE OR STAY EXECUTION This matter came before the Court upon the Defendant's Motion to VacateSentence or Stay Execution. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 5:52 pm
There wasn't a lot of political talk, but I heard a long-term "yellow dog" Democrat say that he would never vote for Hillary no matter what. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”]  If the evidence that it’s false advertising is the use of the mark itself, then plaintiffs will argue that nothing else mattered (intent, other deceptive acts, nature of the packaging). [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:46 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Knowing exactly where underrepresented candidates are getting pushed out of the process matters because the fix for diversifying the initial pool is very different from the fix when only well-connected white men are getting high marks for interviews. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:05 am
The concept of bad faith relates to a subjective motivation on the side of the trade mark applicant, namely a dishonest intention or other sinister motive (Copernicus-Trademarks v EUIPO — Maquet (LUCEO), T‑82/14). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:46 am
Likelihood of confusion is not necessarily avoided between otherwise confusingly similar marks merely by adding or deleting other distinctive matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:08 am
The IPKat will scrutinise the actual decision but can't really find much fault here but wonders what do the readers think? [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:09 am
Unlike CTM applicants, the Office seems to be in court on a virtually daily basis and it gets the chance to rehearse and refine submissions that are frequently made - particularly on procedural and evidential matters. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:24 am by Jani Ihalainen
Due to the similarity of the brands used, combit brought proceedings in Germany aiming to prevent the use of the mark for the marketing of Commit's software (with the matter ultimately being referred to the EU courts). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Her focus: protectable subject matter. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
 Class 25 was a different matter:  Since the Class 25 goods covered by the mark formed no part of Friis's appeal, the Cancellation Division’s decision to reject the application for a declaration of invalidity became final with respect to those goods.Cat's pyjamas: a new product line for LV? [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:24 am
During a deposition, TiVo marked an e-mail as an exhibit and questioned the deponent for several minutes about the e-mail before AT&T's counsel demanded that TiVo return the e-mail. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:06 pm
Although the Washington Redskins logo is probably less offensive than the logo of the Cleveland Indians, the name "Redskins" is, if not inevitably derogatory, sufficiently so to render the trademark in that name invalid under a provision of the Lanham Act denying trademark protection to any mark that "[c]onsists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
As it was possible to delete a mark in the series, Cadbury thought it could deem the “predominant” wording one mark and delete it, getting rid of the problem. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:01 pm
But today he really misses the mark though, naming Richard Cohen Wanker of the Day, thanks to some overblown reporting by Media Matters. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:45 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark MAVA for various clothing items, including t-shirts, pants, gym suits, athletic uniforms, and footwear, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the identical mark registered for "personal training services in the field of athletic performance. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:24 am by Brian Cuban
“Just being offensive or objectionable doesn’t get it taken off Facebook. [read post]