Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 461 - 480
of 14,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 12:07 am
"[T]he transformation of a term into a truly famous mark" means that the mark must be a household name. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:25 am
Floyd LJ did not consider the matter to be entirely clear cut and if the question of substantial value had proven essential to the appeal he would have referred to the CJEU. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:14 pm
Mark Klein, the retired AT&T engineer who stepped forward with the technical documents at the heart of the anti-wiretapping case against AT&T, is furious at the Senate's vote on Wednesday night to hold a vote on a bill intended to put an end to that lawsuit and more than 30 others. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:53 am
And M represents the trade mark invoked by X. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
Or is it that strong marks don’t get much protection and weak marks don’t either? [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
T 556/95, T 798/95, T 394/96 and T 355/03).[4] It follows from the above that, for determining the completion of proceedings before the decision-making department, it has to be established when the decision was handed over by the formalities section to the EPO postal service for notification.[5] The appellant submitted that, in accordance with established case law (G 12/91 [9.1]; T 556/95 [6]; T 394/96 [4]) as well as with established EPO… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
The General Court then turned to the actual matter at hand. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
The General Court then turned to the actual matter at hand. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:52 am
For example, Paragraph 18 stated that All Authentic offered a counterfeit “Steel Curtain Custom Limited Edition Steelers Jersey” using numbers and colors associated with the Steelers and that “[t]he Steelers have strong common law rights in the mark ‘Steel Curtain’ and own a state registration for the mark “Steel Curtain … Pittsburgh Steelers. [read post]
10 May 2009, 4:33 pm
“Just being offensive or objectionable doesn’t get it taken off Facebook. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 4:26 am
High marks are for excellence, not grit. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am
And this is just one T-shirt. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:31 am
Texas Observer editor Bob Moser posts, "Blood on Our Hands: Why the Jones Case Matters. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:15 pm
It's time to talk about what really matters: the underrated use of exclamation marks in Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
Therefore, the decision could not stand, and the matters were reconsidered.Consent and second-hand salesBoth parties agreed that there was no express consent but the Applicant argued that there was implied consent (relimg on The Sunrider Corp v OHIM EU Case T-203/02 as establishing that implied consent would qualify). [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 5:54 am
The individual is wearing a t-shirt with a design that is not featured in the mark drawing, and the gloved hands are not shown. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 2:29 pm
An excerpt from Media Matters for America v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:17 am
In thirteen percent of the examined cases they weren’t using the marks at all. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 8:23 am
As a matter of law, Tropper wasn’t vicariously liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 7:29 am
" Moreover, the mark "lacks any additional fanciful, arbitrary, or suggestive matter. [read post]
