Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 461 - 480
of 16,143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
”] If the evidence that it’s false advertising is the use of the mark itself, then plaintiffs will argue that nothing else mattered (intent, other deceptive acts, nature of the packaging). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:09 am
Unlike CTM applicants, the Office seems to be in court on a virtually daily basis and it gets the chance to rehearse and refine submissions that are frequently made - particularly on procedural and evidential matters. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:05 am
The concept of bad faith relates to a subjective motivation on the side of the trade mark applicant, namely a dishonest intention or other sinister motive (Copernicus-Trademarks v EUIPO — Maquet (LUCEO), T‑82/14). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:46 am
Likelihood of confusion is not necessarily avoided between otherwise confusingly similar marks merely by adding or deleting other distinctive matter. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:24 am
Due to the similarity of the brands used, combit brought proceedings in Germany aiming to prevent the use of the mark for the marketing of Commit's software (with the matter ultimately being referred to the EU courts). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
Class 25 was a different matter: Since the Class 25 goods covered by the mark formed no part of Friis's appeal, the Cancellation Division’s decision to reject the application for a declaration of invalidity became final with respect to those goods.Cat's pyjamas: a new product line for LV? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Her focus: protectable subject matter. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:24 am
During a deposition, TiVo marked an e-mail as an exhibit and questioned the deponent for several minutes about the e-mail before AT&T's counsel demanded that TiVo return the e-mail. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:06 pm
Although the Washington Redskins logo is probably less offensive than the logo of the Cleveland Indians, the name "Redskins" is, if not inevitably derogatory, sufficiently so to render the trademark in that name invalid under a provision of the Lanham Act denying trademark protection to any mark that "[c]onsists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or… [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:01 pm
But today he really misses the mark though, naming Richard Cohen Wanker of the Day, thanks to some overblown reporting by Media Matters. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:55 am
The rest of us don’t have that luxury. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
As it was possible to delete a mark in the series, Cadbury thought it could deem the “predominant” wording one mark and delete it, getting rid of the problem. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:24 am
“Just being offensive or objectionable doesn’t get it taken off Facebook. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:16 pm
Don’t know whether to laugh or weep: why one local activist thinks Washington, D.C. would be better off without Wal-Mart [Mark Perry] Tags: Wal-Mart, Washington D.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:45 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark MAVA for various clothing items, including t-shirts, pants, gym suits, athletic uniforms, and footwear, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the identical mark registered for "personal training services in the field of athletic performance. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:42 am
If you don’t want the added cost of litigating a matter in a Korean court, please register your trademark in Korea. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
District Court for the District of Columbia recently held that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) erred as a matter of law in applying the three-part test for primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:07 am
(I have not been able to work out how to find details of Weimar Republic trade marks, and the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA.de) doesn't seem to offer such historical information.)Why on earth register it as a trade mark? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:56 am
” (Should that matter? [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
James may own a sound recording copyright (for the master recording) but that doesn't give him any dibs over the song copyright. [read post]
