Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 481 - 500
of 16,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2012, 4:24 am
During a deposition, TiVo marked an e-mail as an exhibit and questioned the deponent for several minutes about the e-mail before AT&T's counsel demanded that TiVo return the e-mail. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
Class 25 was a different matter: Since the Class 25 goods covered by the mark formed no part of Friis's appeal, the Cancellation Division’s decision to reject the application for a declaration of invalidity became final with respect to those goods.Cat's pyjamas: a new product line for LV? [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:06 pm
Although the Washington Redskins logo is probably less offensive than the logo of the Cleveland Indians, the name "Redskins" is, if not inevitably derogatory, sufficiently so to render the trademark in that name invalid under a provision of the Lanham Act denying trademark protection to any mark that "[c]onsists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or… [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:55 am
The rest of us don’t have that luxury. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:01 pm
But today he really misses the mark though, naming Richard Cohen Wanker of the Day, thanks to some overblown reporting by Media Matters. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
As it was possible to delete a mark in the series, Cadbury thought it could deem the “predominant” wording one mark and delete it, getting rid of the problem. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:45 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark MAVA for various clothing items, including t-shirts, pants, gym suits, athletic uniforms, and footwear, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the identical mark registered for "personal training services in the field of athletic performance. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:16 pm
Don’t know whether to laugh or weep: why one local activist thinks Washington, D.C. would be better off without Wal-Mart [Mark Perry] Tags: Wal-Mart, Washington D.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:42 am
If you don’t want the added cost of litigating a matter in a Korean court, please register your trademark in Korea. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:24 am
“Just being offensive or objectionable doesn’t get it taken off Facebook. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
District Court for the District of Columbia recently held that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) erred as a matter of law in applying the three-part test for primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:07 am
(I have not been able to work out how to find details of Weimar Republic trade marks, and the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA.de) doesn't seem to offer such historical information.)Why on earth register it as a trade mark? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:56 am
” (Should that matter? [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
James may own a sound recording copyright (for the master recording) but that doesn't give him any dibs over the song copyright. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:02 pm
The victim, Mark Poveromo, had hired the thief, Mark R. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
Even if McCarthy’s statement means that a trade dress with more elements is generally weaker than a trademark with fewer elements, that didn’t matter on the facts of this case. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:43 pm
Some cases are certainly of higher profile than others, but that doesn’t make them more important than any other. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:23 am
But that didn't matter: there was a likelihood of confusion, there were witnesses to attest to the fact that they had thought the club and the television programme were connected, or came from the same source, and that was all that was needed. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:31 am
It is often pointed out that small differences matter when analyzing whether a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a mark. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am
Parallel importation also shares the field with exhaustion, potentially leaving the original seller without recourse as their rights have expired, but the matter hasn't been addressed in the EU courts for over 20 years. [read post]
