Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 521 - 540 of 16,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Binding precedent establishes that §2(a) doesn’t violate the First Amendment because it doesn’t ban use of a mark. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:31 am
But the specimen wouldn't match the drawing.I'm not convinced that applicant was trying to register more than one mark. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:59 am by Robert Kraft
No matter your age, you want to feel healthy, energetic, and live an active life. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The appearance of the drug doesn’t matter. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am by Jani
As such the marks were cancelled; however this is not the end of the matter entirely.Even after the mark has been cancelled the organization retains the rights in the marks during any appeal processes; something which Bob Raskopf, the trademark lawyer for the Redskins, has indicated they will do. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Pleading facts indicating that a mark is well-known doesn’t suffice. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The decision was based on the request filed on October 31.The Board of appeal found that the applicant’s right to be heard had been violated:Fundamental deficiencies[3] The appellant contests the decision of the ED essentially for both procedural and substantive matters. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Strength:  the court bungles conceptual strength (conflating suggestive and descriptive), but it doesn’t matter because (a) there’s not much evidence of marketplace strength and (b) it doesn’t matter anyway because this is a labeling case [the court doesn’t say (b) outright but it’s true]. [read post]
With Messi (see cases C-449/18P and C-474/18P MESSI)  and Miley Cyrus (case T‑368/20 MILEY CYRUS), we learnt that reputation or renown of (personal) names is a factor which should be taken in consideration when comparing marks and which may ultimately exclude confusion with an earlier similar mark. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 11:15 am
  The application raised a few eyebrows because on the face of it, the program that the mark related to appeared to be one that the City had funded and it wasn’t clear why the Mayor would be filing  an application  in his own name rather than in the name of the City. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:16 am by Ron Coleman
 And as a matter of law the PTO can’t register two marks that are likely to be confused. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 3:30 am by Mark Tushnet
Mark Tushnet Every once in a while you read an article that makes you smack your head and say, “Duh—this is so obvious (and obviously right)—that I can’t understand why I didn’t see it before. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:24 pm by Michael Atkins
It doesn’t matter if the later use is likely to cause confusion — the standard for trademark infringement. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 11:56 am by Ron Coleman
Macy’s successfully defended the validity of the marks on a theory of “secondary source,”explained this way: It is a matter of common knowledge that T-shirts are “ornamented” with various insignia, including college insignias, or “ornamented” with various sayings such as “Swallow Your Leader”. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Dave
Wychavon DC v EM is a double decision, so to speak, by Judge Mark on a housing benefit matter, with broader implications regarding incapacity. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Dave
Wychavon DC v EM is a double decision, so to speak, by Judge Mark on a housing benefit matter, with broader implications regarding incapacity. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:48 am
But Trump didn't meet Melania when he was 38 and she was 15, and he wasn't her high school teacher. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Fat years and lean years didn’t just happen…” [read post]