Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 41 - 60
of 16,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
I figure trade marks are a gift and I don't intend on wasting it"Leo Titanic Belfast may have saidDid Titanic Spa infringe? [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:42 am
Teal Bay falsely represented to the PTO that it used “shorebilly” as a mark on T-shirts, rather than ornamentally. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 1:12 am
Prior to marketing products, services or a business in Korea do a thorough search for like trademarks/service marks in Korea, then, have your trademarks/service marks registered in Korea – if you don’t want the added cost of litigating a matter at a Korean court. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 9:08 am
They were rejected because of a lack of distinctiveness (General Court cases T-570/19, T-571/19 and T-572/19). [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:38 pm
For [confusingly] similar trade marks – KATKIT and KIT T KAT Give me a break: the Kit Kat parody video here [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:00 pm
" Title: Mark Heyrman: "Why the Legal Standard for Involuntary Commitment to Mental Hospitals Doesn't Matter (Much)" Length: 56:11 minutes (51.45 MB) Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 128Kbps (CBR) Right [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:48 am
Of course there’s a fine line between this approach and diluting the value of registered rights by allowing extraneous matter to be considered, a line which I’m glad I don’t have to decide on! [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:32 am
Mark cites adage that there is too much law for those can it afford, and not enough for those who can’t. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:47 pm
This case isn't about liability of billions of euros of bad debt following sub-prime lending. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Well, it doesn't really matter what the standard is, or was, any more, so I won't go into it. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
But to deserve the classification as criminal, as a legal matter, the act of counterfeiting must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" to fit within the exact text of the relevant statute, the Trademark Counterfeiting Act. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:13 am
Comment The judgment shows that reputed trade marks will not always be spared from revocation, and that in the assessment of trade mark use, it matters how customers view the products. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:40 am
For trade marks, however, the matter is not so straightforward. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
Unfortunately this fast-and-loose attitude won’t do you any favours in the land of trade mark registrations. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
Unfortunately this fast-and-loose attitude won’t do you any favours in the land of trade mark registrations. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:43 am
Justice Mark Dwyer, without robes. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 10:04 am
“Virginia Democrats’ Victory Proves That Gerrymandering Matters; When they aren’t held back by racist redistricting tactics, Democrats can actually win”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:36 pm
"The Only Constitutional Right That Matters: Conservative judges want to protect domestic abusers' right to bear arms; Why don't they care about protecting the right to vote? [read post]
