Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 581 - 600
of 14,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2019, 8:04 pm
The USPTO refused to grant Brunetti’s application to register the mark — finding that the mark “comprises immoral * * * or scandalous matter” and thus cannot be registered under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Case T‑394/10, Elena Grebenshikova v OHIM, Volvo Trademark Holding AB intervening, is a fascinating decision of the General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) on 5 December. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
It didn’t “adopt” a similar mark at all; it compared its products to those of APT. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
From here you can edit the entry, add attendees, and/or mark the matter as billable. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 pm
It’s easy to say that safe havens don’t matter if everywhere is a safe haven. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 1:24 am
What matters more, to me and I bet to more than a few others, is what she's done in those jobs. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Such an agreement says in effect "we don't believe that there is a likelihood of confusion, please take our word for it. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
If the statute has certain factors in it, and it doesn’t have other factors in it, and the court considers extraneous matters, isn’t that subject to appellate review? [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:45 am
Thus the defense was not available as a procedural matter. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
First, most of the statements at issue predated the registration date for the mark (though that really shouldn’t matter since trademark rights depend on use, not registration). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
Mar. 30, 2017)Some mention of my previous blogging on the issue, but that doesn’t matter to the ultimate result (though the court at least notices the incontestability problem). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:52 pm
Stop mass surveillance of digital communications and communication records.It doesn’t matter what legal authority is being cited—whether it’s the Patriot Act, the FISA Amendments Act, or an executive order—the government should not be sweeping up massive amounts of information by and about innocent people first, then sorting out whether any of its targets are included later. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
And yet: if people really would be confused, why would it matter that the claimed subject matter was abstract? [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
Moreover, it didn’t matter that WD-40 used “inhibitor” on only one product, rather than every product in the line. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:47 pm
It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you in trouble. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:13 am
Fortunately, it didn’t matter, since Ahmed failed to show standing under the Lexmark test too. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
It doesn’t always make sense to apply territorial rules in a global online environment. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:13 am
Illinois is a no-fault divorce state, which means it doesn’t really matter who files for divorce first. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:08 pm
With a slew of formals and May Balls being organised by societies to mark the end of the academic year, you couldn’t possibly be more nervous about being judged on tea etiquette. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:57 pm
Mark S. [read post]
