Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 601 - 620 of 14,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
“Alusnap” is a trade mark (see column 2, lines 45 to 47 of the patent in suit). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:55 am
In Great Neck, 2011 was marked by a major high school SAT cheating scandal that rocked the community and brought additional scrutiny to New York education law matters that were thrust into the limelight. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:12 am by fuzzyone
  I don't think it is fair to compare the Occupy Movement with the Tea Party for many reasons. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
  Several car articles on the matter (here, here, and even The Hollywood Reporter here) left it to speculation as to why the mark was abandoned. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 6:48 am
[TTABlogged here].In its District of Columbia decision, the Board observed that "[t]he remedy that applicant seeks is a matter that might be addressed legislatively, but we have no authority to change the words of the statute." [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 12:50 am
  As Mark suggests, filing amended tax returns makes the most sense when confronted with this issue - as long as it doesn't happen too late - as was the case in the example in Mark's post. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
But it didn’t do them any gouda – the Court upheld the UKIPO’s finding and the mark is no more.Despite an attack on several bases, the mark was only lost in the UKIPO because of the lack clarity caused by the reference to “the colour red” in the description of the mark. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 6:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It didn’t matter that, if a user searches “royal silk,” the phrase will appear in the URL for the search page. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Which is to say it wants to prevent other people from using the mark in expressive ways such as on T-shirts and mugs. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
However, the Board pointed out, matter that does not indicate source cannot be registered because it does not meet the statutory definition of a mark. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 1:45 pm by Elizabeth Kruska
The New Trustee thought it wisest to ask the court to hold a hearing on the matter. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 3:43 pm by Gennie Gebhart
No matter how Zuckerberg slices it, Facebook’s business model revolves around monetizing your data. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:12 pm by Armand Grinstajn
The OD's considerations on A 83 might have negatively influenced their decision with regard to added matter (A 76(1), 123(2) and 123(3)). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:42 am by Mark Summerfield
Samsung patent hearing begins; Samsung sacrificed Qualcomm truce for Apple war; Apple: our 3G isn't Samsung's 3G; and Samsung accuses Apple of ‘ambush litigation’. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:43 am by SHG
It was only a matter of time before someone would add two and two and come up with 37. [read post]