Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 641 - 660
of 16,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 pm
It’s easy to say that safe havens don’t matter if everywhere is a safe haven. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 2:49 pm
appeared first on Mendik Matters. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:51 pm
I am reading once more Jeremy Waldron’s wonderful book, Law and Disagreement (1999), the complementary volume to his equally worthy Seeley Lectures, published as The Dignity of Legislation (1999) (for the record, I don’t share Waldron’s thoughts—or those of Larry Kramer or Mark Tushnet for that matter—on judicial review), which is relevant to several things I’m working on, but especially toward completing a couple of reviews of recent… [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
It didn’t “adopt” a similar mark at all; it compared its products to those of APT. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Such an agreement says in effect "we don't believe that there is a likelihood of confusion, please take our word for it. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:45 am
Thus the defense was not available as a procedural matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
If the statute has certain factors in it, and it doesn’t have other factors in it, and the court considers extraneous matters, isn’t that subject to appellate review? [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 1:24 am
What matters more, to me and I bet to more than a few others, is what she's done in those jobs. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 6:21 pm
And as a matter of law the PTO can’t register two marks that are likely to be confused. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
First, most of the statements at issue predated the registration date for the mark (though that really shouldn’t matter since trademark rights depend on use, not registration). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
Mar. 30, 2017)Some mention of my previous blogging on the issue, but that doesn’t matter to the ultimate result (though the court at least notices the incontestability problem). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:52 pm
Stop mass surveillance of digital communications and communication records.It doesn’t matter what legal authority is being cited—whether it’s the Patriot Act, the FISA Amendments Act, or an executive order—the government should not be sweeping up massive amounts of information by and about innocent people first, then sorting out whether any of its targets are included later. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:38 pm
For prior posts on the matter, click here, here and here. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:13 am
Illinois is a no-fault divorce state, which means it doesn’t really matter who files for divorce first. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
It doesn’t always make sense to apply territorial rules in a global online environment. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
Moreover, it didn’t matter that WD-40 used “inhibitor” on only one product, rather than every product in the line. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
And yet: if people really would be confused, why would it matter that the claimed subject matter was abstract? [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:13 am
Fortunately, it didn’t matter, since Ahmed failed to show standing under the Lexmark test too. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 am
In the matter of United States V. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:03 am
Read SEC Awards $114 Million to Two Whistleblowers, Including an Apparent Outsider, Passing the $1 Billion Mark with a Bang at constantinecannon.com [read post]