Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 81 - 100
of 16,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2007, 4:53 am
" Therefore, it found that "the marks are distinguished by their respective additional matter," and it concluded that their overall commercial impressions are not similar. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 1:44 pm
Clinical Professor of Law Mark Heyrman delivered this lengthily titled CBI on November 6, 2007. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:38 am
Ask Mark Leech... [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:16 am
Meetings do matter. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:16 am
Meetings do matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:53 am
These two feuding chocolate makers never seem to take a break from litigation, so this KitKat won’t be surprised if an appeal from the refusal to amend the mark soon follows. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
Will the election matter? [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:31 pm
” J.A. 8.As to burdens-->“The determination that a mark comprises scandalous matter is a conclusion of law based upon underlying factual inquiries. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 1:02 pm
Cox The post Tweet Containing Question Mark Isn’t Defamatory–Boulger v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:19 am
And an ITC determination that a claimed patent didn’t cover the marked product was sufficient to allege false marking, even if ITC determinations aren’t binding law. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
Alas, Brigadier General Mark Martins, now the chief prosecutor of the military commissions, can’t blog for Lawfare any more, as he did when he was in the field in Afghanistan. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
However, the Board emphasized that “no matter how hard a company attempts to make an inherently nondistinctive word or symbol serve as a unique source identifier, it is proof of results—that consumers so perceive the purported mark—that is the touchstone of our inquiry into acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
However, the Board emphasized that “no matter how hard a company attempts to make an inherently nondistinctive word or symbol serve as a unique source identifier, it is proof of results—that consumers so perceive the purported mark—that is the touchstone of our inquiry into acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:15 am
Examples of marks that have been refused on this ground include:STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF AMERICATHE CHRISTIAN PROSTITUTEDEMOCRATS SHOULDN’T BREED FAGDOG N.I.G.G.A. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:02 am
This European trade mark judges' network. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 7:42 am
Ciavarella and Michael T. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Further, the GC refers to the trade mark at issue simply as "non-registered mark" -- and all this bring us back to an old, tricky question: shouldn't EU Courts know national law? [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 12:50 pm
” LII donor Mark D. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 6:00 pm
I explained to him that his attorney wouldn’t know if he doesn’t handle estate matters (Mark said he does not). [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 6:00 pm
However, I explained to Mark that legally Frank was entitled to a share because Melanie didn’t leave a will. [read post]
