Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 141 - 160 of 16,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2016, 2:55 am
The Board of Appeal referred to cases of C-191/01 Doublemint [para 32] and T-19/04  Paperlab [20], which both state that that the mark did not have to be descriptive at the time of registration. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:17 am by hollywoodreporter
By Eriq Gardner Does it matter that Joe Brown of the "Judge Joe Brown Show" isn't licensed to practice law in California? [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 6:33 am
At the end of the day though, it's all a matter of fact.The IPKat is glad that the AG hasn't added another layer of complexity by formulating her own definition of trade mark use. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
See Dial-A-Mattress I, 57 USPQ2d at 1813 (“Although the registration of the ‘(212) M-A-T-R-E-S-S’ mark is a ‘phantom’ mark, … ‘1-888-M-A-TR-E-S-S’ is the legal equivalent of the ‘(212) M-A-T-T-R-E-S-S’ mark. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Quality King argued that it didn’t need to own the mark at issue to win a false designation claim, but Second Circuit precedent disagreed with it. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:35 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The US Gov’t petition for en banc reheraing in the Brunetti (FUCT) scandalous mark case has been denied without opinion. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:40 pm by Anna Bower
And it’s being litigated here because Pickens is where former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows resides—or, rather, where he says he resides. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
  Maybe the USPTO could benefit from subscribing to the “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:26 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark CITY OF HEROES for t-shirts and other clothing items, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the identical mark registered for computer and video games. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 6:25 am by James B. Astrachan
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia affirming the cancellation by the United States Patent and Trademark Office of the Redskins mark may be real entertainment. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:30 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
We know that Mark will continue to do great things for his country no matter what he chooses to do next. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:57 am by Hayleigh Bosher
As I explained in the Guardian: “It doesn’t matter that Beyoncé didn’t actually infringe Kelis’s rights. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:52 am by Bob Kraft
The post 5 Marks of What Makes a Good (and Bad) Lawyer appeared first on [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:03 am by war
It may establish that Network used the mark at a time before registration, but it doesn’t negate the possibility that Channel was, in fact, also a user (and indeed the first user) of the mark before registration. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 11:40 am by John Phillips
Negative publicity was in the cards, no matter what happened. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:37 pm
Come to think of it, it won't be responsible for copyright, plant breeders' rights, geographical indications, domain names ...] [read post]