Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 161 - 180 of 15,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Although Applicant is a member of the tribe, membership alone is not sufficient: "[t]here must be a specific commercial connection between applicant and the tribe, evidencing the tribe's endorsement or sponsorship of applicant's sale of cigarettes. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
Nevertheless, he seems to have got his answer in Case T-621/14 Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM and, although the matter is by no means ‘hot news’ at this point, it still merits some discussion.Infocit lodged an application for a Community trade mark for the word “DINKOOL” in respect of several goods in classes 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 12, 16, 20 and 21. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:40 am by Tamera H. Bennett
Keep reading for tips on proper use of your trademark on clothing.Size Matters For Trademarks On ClothingTypically the smaller and more discrete a mark is used on clothing, the more likely the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
***************************************Trade mark oppositions:don't expect a quick resultSays Merpel: in the first case the opposed CTM application was filed in December 2006; that's nearly eight years ago. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 11:18 am
Today's GW IP colloquium featured Mark Schultz, who spoke on Copynorms: Copyright and Social Norms. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:08 am by Conrad B. Wilton
   For instance, Kagan notes the USPTO granted registration of marks to the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) program while refusing to register the marks “BONG HITS 4 JESUS”, “YOU CAN’T SPELL HEALTHCARE WITHOUT THC”, and “MARIJUANA KOLA. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 12:10 am
 This Kat recalls that this is not his friend's first foray into slightly mischievous trade mark matters. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Don't get me wrong: I welcome review and reform of family justice, as I've stated here many times previously. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:09 pm by Mark Tushnet
shows is that context matters: "Would it help? [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:02 pm by Lorraine Fleck
The test for confusion is whether, as a matter of “first impression in the mind of a causal consumer somewhat in a hurry who sees the [mark] at a time when he or she has no more than an imperfect recollection of the [prior] trade-mark, and does not pause to give the matter any detailed consideration or scrutiny, nor to examine closely the similarities and differences between the marks”. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Elsewhere it won’t be changing either because the Member State isn’t interested or it can’t legally change. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:02 pm by Glenn Reynolds
After all, the release at JFK marked the second time, in a matter of months, that Awlaki wriggled free despite the heavy cloud of 9/11 suspicion that hovered over him.” [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:42 pm
We don't deal with FDA regulatory matters that often, and with the criminal side even less,... [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  GL couldn’t find any authority holding that patent marks can’t be displayed when a product is used in a manner potentially not covered by the patents. [read post]