Search for: "Matter of Martin B."
Results 61 - 80
of 885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 10:59 am
For example, in Martin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Bonnett, Noah B. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Bonnett, Noah B. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Bonnett, Noah B. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Bonnett, Noah B. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:22 am
” “Party A put $1 million in escrow for later payment to Party B if Party B prevailed in court. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am
[b.] [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:01 am
Cash on hand or in checking or savings accounts; b. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
Savarese, and Noah B. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
Savarese, and Noah B. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
§ 1252(a)(2)(D), or whether this determination is a discretionary judgment call unreviewable under Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
The two new relists this week involve very disparate subject matter. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
§ 12211(b). [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:06 am
It would be both unjust and disproportionate for me to make a restoration order in the face of that TMRO, not least given that, upon the expiry of that TMRO in March 2024, there may be a petition for faculty to set matters on a permanent lawful footing. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:13 pm
” San Martin v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
Evidence that repatriation would expose the child to abuse at the petitioner’s hands goes directly to the grave risk of harm that Article 13(b) seeks to preclude. [read post]
