Search for: "Matter of Newman" Results 1 - 20 of 1,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 7:37 pm by Patent Docs
The first is a letter from Judge Newman's counsel in the action brought by the Judge's complaint filed in D.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:37 pm by Patent Docs
Cir. 2023)Judge Newman and the On-Going Attempts to Remove Her from the Federal CircuitSequoia Technology LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0548, 2012 MT 47, JUDITH NEWMAN, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF KARLYE NEWMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 8:58 am by Eric Guttag
  And fortunately for us patent prosecutors, In re Vaidyanathan is one of those cases where Newman waxed very eloquent in saying:  “Obviousness is determined as a matter of foresight, not hindsight. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
District Court for the District of Columbia on Friday that it should dismiss Judge Pauline Newman’s remaining challenges to the Council’s decision to suspend Newman indefinitely from the court because all of Newman’s claims “fail as a matter of law. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
District Court for the District of Columbia on Friday that it should dismiss Judge Pauline Newman’s remaining challenges to the Council’s decision to suspend Newman indefinitely from the court because all of Newman’s claims “fail as a matter of law. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:32 pm by Stephen Page
Queensland Premier Campbell Newman has told the Brisbane Times that his pre-election promise as to surrogacy: “We will not be making any changes to the laws on those matters” was a "mistake". [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Responsive to the letter from Judge Pauline Newman's counsel sent June 15th (see "Judge Newman Matter Continues"), the Special Committee directing the Federal Circuit's inquiry regarding Judge Newman's fitness for continued service on the Court (consisting of Chief Judge Moore, former Chief Judge Prost, and Judge Taranto) issued a per curiam response. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:10 am by LEG
Newman discusses his thoughts on the intervention of the Obama administration in this matter. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:09 am
" Newman published the lyrics in a New York Times op-ed in January 2007. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:30 am by Gene Quinn
Judges Newman and Lourie, however, currently qualify to move to senior status or retire, and in a matter of a few years Judge Linn could elect senior status, or to retire, as well. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Responsive to the letter from Judge Pauline Newman's counsel sent June 15th (see "Judge Newman Matter Continues"), the Special Committee directing the Federal Circuit's inquiry regarding Judge Newman's fitness for continued service on the Court (consisting of Chief Judge Moore, former Chief Judge Prost, and Judge Taranto) issued a per curiam response. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 1:32 pm by Glo
I say that because I find it odd that the manager of the bar has told news outlets that his employees aren’t commenting on the matter. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
According to a statement of court and two published orders, it seems that Chief Judge Moore also has the support of her fellow judges in this matter. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:40 am by Mandelman
So,  without further delay, turn up your speakers click below and get ready for attorney Shawn Newman and how he sees fraudclosure by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac… on Mandelman Matters Podcast. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 5:41 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
He represents whistleblowers in False Claims Act qui tam cases involving pharmaceutical fraud and other health care fraud matters. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
It is not a trivial matter to require the parties, the trial judge, and perhaps ultimately this court, to repeat in the trial context much of what they have already done. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 8:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The ruling on claim scope is a matter of “claim construction,”which is ultimately a question of law. [read post]