Search for: "Matter of Padilla"
Results 1 - 20
of 408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2012, 4:15 pm
The biggest news thus far on the Padilla retroactivity front, and most followers of the issue have presumably already read about this, is the decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court in the Gaitan matter which held that Padilla announced a “new rule” and therefore could not be applied retroactively. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
Motion to Dismiss Padilla (PDF)Motion to Dismiss Padilla (Text) [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:01 am
It's a fine point and probably one that would not matter in most cases of ineffective assistance, but is still worth mentioning, especially since the issue for most immigrant defendants facing imminent deportation is not actually contesting guilt in a full-blown trial but securing a favorable plea deal that would avoid adverse immigration consequences - a fact emphasized by the Padilla majority, Padilla, 130 S. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 12:12 pm
Judge Marcia Cooke will hold a status conference Monday on the issue of Padilla's competency. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 8:04 pm
In immigration related matters, the controlling case is Padilla v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 3:02 am
Several readers have written to ask what we think about the guilty verdict in the Padilla case.Our colleague Scott Horton, who has been a one-man force of nature blogging over at Harper's, with 723 posts in under five months (!) [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:59 am
Judge Gotschall based this conclusion on two grounds: first, that the Supreme Court itself decided the Padilla matter on its merits rather than on retroactivity procedural grounds which it could very well have done; and second, that Padilla was really an extension of Strickland that highlighted the importance of counsel informing a client of immigration consequences from a criminal conviction, a practice that has long been advocated by the ABA and other bar… [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:53 am
As a practical matter, defense attorneys have to do sufficient investigation to determine whether the potential immigration consequences of an offense are clear or unclear. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 2:49 am
Does it matter? [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:04 pm
Padilla v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:03 pm
Brown (University of Virginia School of Law) has posted Why Padilla Doesn’t Matter (Much) (UCLA Law Review, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Here's my question: Why does it matter how we label the treatment? [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Brokers must publicly disclose reportable events on their CRD customer complaints, IRS tax liens, judgments, investigations, and even criminal matters. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:53 am
As a practical matter, defense attorneys have to do sufficient investigation to determine whether the potential immigration consequences of an offense are clear or unclear. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
Padilla. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:21 pm
This is precisely what the Supreme Court did in Padilla. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 3:24 pm
" [Moreover, as a practical matter it may be difficult to get testimony from Padilla to support his claim, given his incarceration and his mental health.] [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
What really matters is the merits of the suit. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:22 am
It can happen, but it's all a matter of risk tolerance.With surprising frequency, collateral consequences can be monumentally harsh. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 8:47 am
The United States Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in Padilla v. [read post]
