Search for: "Matter of Parsons" Results 1 - 20 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2009, 10:37 am
Ask your firm on a major matter to project two or three plausible ways the matter might reach resolution and their estimated fees for each way. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:02 am by David Fraser
Christopher Parsons has a very informative blog post about IMSI catchers, which includes a link to an amici curiae submission to a US court which provides a additional insights. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Although Parson appears to believe his lawsuit is a private matter, he is mistaken. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 8:51 pm
However, he found that, as a matter of law, school officials’ conduct was not “extreme or outrageous”. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 7:33 pm
His big fear was the "risk [of] creating uncertainty in a delicate matter of great national importance. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:45 pm
One leading candidate is Richard Parsons, the chairman of Time Warner and a member [...] [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:34 am by tom
I will also remain the attorney in charge of and responsible for my clients’ continuing and new matters.   [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 8:51 pm
However, he found that, as a matter of law, school officials’ conduct was not “extreme or outrageous”. [read post]
8 May 2019, 6:17 am
Burns, Deborah DeHaas, Debbie McCormack, Maureen Bujno, Krista Parsons, and Bob Lamm. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 7:28 am by scanner1
Parsons DA 17-0576 2019 MT 56 Civil – Municipal Court Appeal Matter of Z.B., YINC DA 18-0345 2019 MT 55N Civil – Dependent Neglect State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:25 am by Pilar G. Kraman
After weighing the evidence presented at trial, Vice Chancellor Parsons determined that the information at issue were protected trade secrets. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
After researching the matter and discussing it with attorneys around the state, including former Brazos County District Attorney Bill Turner, Parsons declined to prosecute because no action was taken during the discussions and there did not appear to be a "willful violation. [read post]