Search for: "Matter of Perez v City of New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2016, 8:02 am
Payment for time involved in donning and doffing of uniforms Perez v The City of New York, USCA, Second Circuit, Docket #15-315 [Source: Justia Daily Opinion Summaries]Justia reports that “[s]everal active and former Assistant Urban Park Rangers (AUPRs) employed by the [New York] City's Parks Department alleged that they, and others similarly situated, were not paid in accordance with the requirements of the Fair… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am
Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:58 am
New York City Dept. of Educ., a summary order issued on May 1. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 9:45 am
Matter of Miriam M. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:30 am
Burns removed the disciplinary matter from OATH’s calendar without prejudice because employee is on leave from ACS pending successful completion of probationary period of employment with her new agency. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:57 am
Termination following discipline hearing conducted in absentia upheldChawki v New York City Department of Education, Manhattan High Schools, District 71, 39 AD3d 321The New York City Department of Education (DOE) served disciplinary charges and specifications on Houda Chawki, a tenured high school teacher. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 6:42 am
The employees at a catering company in New York City were trying to organize a union. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:00 am
” The Appellate Division said that an "agency" is "any state or municipal department, board, bureau, division, commission, committee, public authority, public corporation, council, office or other governmental entity performing a governmental or proprietary function for the state or any one or more municipalities thereof, except the judiciary or the state legislature," citing Public Officers Law §86[3].The court then noted that Nassau Community College [College]… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
NO-FAULT - NF-10'S IN DUPLICATE - 11 NYCRR § 65-3.8Prime Psychological Services, PC, a/a/o Raymond Perez v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 7:06 am
City of New York, issued on August 25. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:25 am
City of New York, decided on August 2. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Rather, in each case the court must undertake an analysis that centers on the authority under which the entity was created, the power distribution or sharing model under which it exists, the nature of its role, the power it possesses and under which it purports to act, and a realistic appraisal of its functional relationship to affected parties and constituencies' (Matter of Smith v City Univ. of NY, 92 NY2d 707, 713 [1999])" (Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; see… [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:01 pm
City of San Antonio (Preliminary Injunction; Religious Freedom) Arocha v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
[McGunigle v City of Quency, USCA, First Circuit, Docket # 15-2224.] [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
In addition to statutory immunity, the City maintained that it was immune from liability under New York common law. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
New York. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The New York Times and Politico petitioned Howell to unseal portions of the grand jury proceedings in October, citing the historic nature of the secret rulings she had issued. [read post]
