Search for: "Matter of Personal Restraint of Long" Results 1 - 20 of 1,052
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2012, 1:03 pm
In Koehler, a 4-3 majority of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (with the minority expressing due process concerns) held that a court sitting in New York that has personal jurisdiction over a garnishee bank can order the bank to produce stock certificates located outside New York, pursuant to CPLR § 5525(b), as long as the court has personal jurisdiction over the defendant. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
Roe, the Circuit Court said that the Constitution protects “an individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters,” such as sexual activity, medical information, and financial matters. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:44 am by Bonnie Frost
As we move forward, many restraints are being lifted, forcing proceedings to go forward remotely. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:35 am by Dan Lopez
In Antitrust Matters, we bring you perspectives of experts and visionaries in the field who discuss where antitrust law has been, where it is going, and why it matters today more than ever before. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:27 am by Law Offices of Ben Yeroushalmi
In addition to hurting the quality of life of the person, frailty critically influences the long-term viability of health care systems. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am by Adam Klein, Benjamin Wittes
There are manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subject for the common good…. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm by familoo
A person commits rape if he intentionally penetrates the v*gina, an*s or mouth of another person (male or female) with the p*nis and that other person does not consent to the penetration and the penetrator does not reasonably believe that that other person is consenting a person consents if he or she agrees by choice and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice the complainant is taken not to have consented unless sufficient evidence is adduced to… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:24 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In 2003, anti-pedophile hysteria resulted in the PROTECT Act, which prohibits US travelers from engaging in sexual intercourse with persons under 18 anywhere in the world no matter the local age of consent. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The FSIA functions as a long-arm statute and confers personal jurisdiction on federal courts if its requirements are met. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:55 pm by familoo
It is long established that for s91(14) orders there need not have been a history of repeated prior unreasonable applications, for that jurisdiction is focused upon the welfare of the child. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
Consequently, we found that the homeowner "was at liberty to waive a constitutional as well as a legal right in a matter of this sort. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am by MBettman
However, injunctions that impose prior restraints on speech and publication have long been disfavored under the law and are wholly unconstitutional under the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:26 am
Use of chemical-restraints in nursing homes is not only dehumanizing but also against the law. [read post]