Search for: "Matter of Personal Restraint of Long" Results 21 - 40 of 1,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Just last week, the Seventh Circuit had two interesting — though not dispositive — opinions on the matter, in McCarthy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 6:52 am by Dan Lopez
In Antitrust Matters, we bring you perspectives of experts and visionaries in the field who discuss where antitrust law has been, where it is going, and why it matters today more than ever before. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:20 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
” This means that lack of seat belt use does not establish, as a matter of law, that the person not using the safety restraints was negligent. [read post]
If you have any questions about this issue, or if you’d like to discuss any other personal injury related matter, please contact our dedicated attorneys at the Law Offices of Aronberg & Aronberg. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 11:58 am by Adam Schwartz
Thus, EFF has long advocated for First Amendment protection of the right to record on-duty police. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 11:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
  These seats are too important, and the effects of a bad choice last too long to take that kind of chance. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
 So paradoxically the advocate of restraint becomes unrestrained when it matters most. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:42 am by JB
  Some younger scholars continue to argue for restraint, while some older ones (such as classical liberals like Richard Epstein) have long argued for what we would now call judicial engagement. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
I sensed more restraint than necessary in the prose. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:33 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
There have long been several reasons advanced by opponents, including cost, but these may no longer matter, as the administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has come out in favor of installing seat belts on school buses. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:52 pm
These elements must be pled "with enough factual matter (taken as true) to suggest that an agreement was made." [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
The District of Columbia’s Licensing and Testing Scheme Is a Content-Based Prior Restraint on Speech The District’s tour guide licensing scheme is a content-based prior restraint on speech, both because it identifies the restricted speech by reference to its subject matter and because it is justified by a desire to affect the content of tour guide speech. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
That doesn’t matter either, so long as there is probable cause. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:24 pm by John Floyd
  It has long been popularly believed that every person in America has an undeniable right to retain the counsel of their choice; that the Government does not have either the power or authority to interfere with that right. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
And even if one thinks that the result in Pentagon Papers should have been foreordained by the original understanding with respect to prior restraints, that argument does not apply to Bartnicki, which did not involve a prior restraint. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Though patents filed before the transition date will remain in force up through March 2033, a good 10+ years away, teachers may also be wondering which regime to emphasize and for how long the pre-AIA rules will still be considered fundamental rather than footnote material. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Though patents filed before the transition date will remain in force up through March 2033, a good 10+ years away, teachers may also be wondering which regime to emphasize and for how long the pre-AIA rules will still be considered fundamental rather than footnote material. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “[W]hile the matter is fairly debatable, Garcia is likely to prevail. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by admin
” For the Ninth Circuit panel hearing the Golden case, California Business and Professions Code § 16600 extends to “any restraint of a substantial character,’ no matter its form or scope. [read post]