Search for: "Matter of Potts"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 5:18 am
However, we are well-versed in these matters and will fight to get to the bottom of what has happened to your loved one. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 2:44 pm
Potts DA 19-0022 2019 MT 202N Civil – Other State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
Professor Potts was played by the talented, Dick Van Dyke. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:12 am
The court held that “employee” under the FCA does not include former employees, saying, “what matters is the employee’s employment status when the employer retaliates. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:34 am
” Relying primarily on the “size of the estate” criteria enunciated a Matter of Potts, 213 AD 59 (4th Dept 1925), aff’d 241 NY 593 (1925), the court reduced the contingent fee to $115,000, and ordered the attorney to refund the excess without interest. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
Potts v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
Further, it is well-settled that time spent is, in fact, the least important factor considered by a court in fixing reasonable compensation akin to Matter of Snell, Matter of Potts, and Matter of Kentana. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
Further, it is well-settled that time spent is, in fact, the least important factor considered by a court in fixing reasonable compensation akin to Matter of Snell, Matter of Potts, and Matter of Kentana. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
Further, it is well-settled that time spent is, in fact, the least important factor considered by a court in fixing reasonable compensation akin to Matter of Snell, Matter of Potts, and Matter of Kentana. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
Further, it is well-settled that time spent is, in fact, the least important factor considered by a court in fixing reasonable compensation akin to Matter of Snell, Matter of Potts, and Matter of Kentana. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
Further, it is well-settled that time spent is, in fact, the least important factor considered by a court in fixing reasonable compensation akin to Matter of Snell, Matter of Potts, and Matter of Kentana. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
Further, it is well-settled that time spent is, in fact, the least important factor considered by a court in fixing reasonable compensation akin to Matter of Snell, Matter of Potts, and Matter of Kentana. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:39 pm
For that matter, I think most lawyers who don't practice criminal law would think this is entrapment. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:09 pm
Obviously the media cannot seek standing if they do not have notice of the matter. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 5:08 am
— Monica Potts (@MonicaBPotts) April 28, 2017 Not that anyone cares what Monica Potts, whoever she is (but she has that blue tick, so she must be twitter-important) says, but Nate Silver, tarnished though he may be after his botch of the election outcome, says so too. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:34 am
” Relying primarily on the “size of the estate” criteria enunciated a Matter of Potts, 213 AD 59 (4th Dept 1925), aff’d 241 NY 593 (1925), the court reduced the contingent fee to $115,000, and ordered the attorney to refund the excess without interest. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:29 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
These include: the time spent (Matter of Kelly); the complexity of the questions involved (Matter of Coughlin); the nature of the services provided (Matter of Von Hole); the amount of litigation required (Matter of Sabatino); the amounts involved and the benefit resulting from the execution of such services (Matter of Shalman); the lawyer's experience and reputation (Matter of Brehm); and the customary fee charged by the Bar for similar services… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:34 am
The Take Away The Potts case is not a binding decision for Michigan employers and employees. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am
The lease construed in Potts v. [read post]
