Search for: "Matter of REA Holding Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2023, 5:15 am by Ryan Goodman
Who qualifies as a “civilian” versus a “combatant” and why does it matter? [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Matter of Coward v Biddle, 2022 WL 17332496 (2d Dept.,2022) the father’s counsel moved, inter alia, to hold the mother in civil contempt for her failure to comply with a prior order of the Family Court which had directed the mother to pay attorneys’ fees directly to the father’s counsel of $3,000. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:58 pm by INFORRM
Fiji Krishna v Sung Rea Kim [2021] FJHC 158– a case concerning an alleged defamatory letter. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
Following that line of cases, the majority of the panel vacated the attorney fee order and remanded for a hearing on the matter where the defendant could be personally heard or for “other evidence in the record demonstrating that the defendant received notice, was aware of the opportunity to be heard on the issue, and chose not to be heard. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-373Issue: Whether a criminal offense that can be committed with a mens rea of recklessness can qualify as a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
He argued that “as a matter of common sense, common parlance, and common practice, determining whether it is ‘appropriate’ to regulate requires consideration of costs. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Thompson, 947 F.2d 666, 676 (3d Cir. 1991) (so holding as a First Amendment matter, but concluding that Pennsylvan [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
(pp. 25-26)    Judgment of the trial court is REVERSED and the indictment is REINSTATED and the matter is REMANDED to the Law Division. [read post]
In his majority opinion, Judge Gorsuch addresses “thorny” questions of administrative law, outlining how the Chevron deference doctrine interacts with Brand X, another administrative law case that holds that an agency’s interpretation of a statute is applied even in the face of circuit precedent, unless that precedent found that the statute at question was “unambiguous” for Chevron purposes. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
If there is any way a court can avoid holding a law unconstitutional, it should do so. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
An Ontario Court of Appeal case, Rea v. [read post]