Search for: "Matter of Seaman" Results 1 - 20 of 348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 5:23 am by Philip D. Lorio, IV
Fifth Circuit reverses district court’s grant of summary judgment, finding that ROV Technician was not a seaman as a matter of law appeared first on MBLB. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:23 am by Philip Lorio, IV
Thus, the Fifth Circuit held that the district court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because it had not been established as a matter of law that the seaman exemption applied. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:23 am by Philip Lorio, IV
Thus, the Fifth Circuit held that the district court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because it had not been established as a matter of law that the seaman exemption applied. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 2:15 am by JobOrtunities Help Wanted
Eckert Seamans is seeking a Patent Agent/Attorney for its Pittsburgh, PA office. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 2:15 am by JobOrtunities Help Wanted
Eckert Seamans is seeking a Patent Agent/Attorney for its Pittsburgh, PA office. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 8:06 am by Rachel Grupp
The case began in December of 2020, when the whistleblower seaman reported a variety of safety concerns to the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Beth Bernstein
The court in the instant matter found that Plaintiff could not demonstrate he was a Jones Act seaman.  [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Beth Bernstein
  The court in the instant matter found that Plaintiff could not demonstrate he was a Jones Act seaman. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
”  Accordingly, Plaintiff was not a seaman and the trial court did not err. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:56 am by David L. Reisman
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm by Frederick B. Goldsmith
March 9, 2017) (en banc), the Washington (state) Supreme Court held, as a matter of law, the issue of the recoverability of punitive damages in a Jones Act seaman’s general maritime law unseaworthiness claim is governed by the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:00 am by Will Bland
His practice areas include maritime personal injury defense, maritime collision and property damage insurance coverage, contractual indemnity, longshore matters and general litigation. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:11 am by Ogletree Abbott
It didn’t matter, the appeals court agreed with the Jones Act attorney, “whether the charterer used the vessel gainfully or not. [read post]
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]