Search for: "Matter of Siegel"
Results 241 - 260
of 437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2008, 10:35 am
The statute of limitations is tolled while the attorney continues to represent the client on a particular matter, in part to protect the professional relationship (see Shumsky, 96 NY2d at 167-168). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:04 am
APCC Services (here) particularly interesting, and we thought we would pass it along for the benefit of those readers as interested as we are in procedural and jurisdictional matters. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
Mital Makadia and David Siegel are partners at Grellas Shah LLP, where they counsel tech start-ups and investors in general corporate, venture financing, mergers and acquisitions, and other transactional matters. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
My sense is that pretty women in China are favored more in employment than in the United States, but that women who do their jobs well (no matter what their looks) are taken seriously. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
Because I can only hope to scratch the surface of the historical evidence presented in the article, I am hopeful that those interested in the matter will investigate the fully developed arguments in the scholarly literature, including my own article and others such as the insightful paper by Neil Sielgel and Robert Cooter in the Stanford Law Review.I begin with Resolution VI of the Virginia Plan. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 10:42 am
"It's much better to have it done two months or a month before the wedding than two weeks or a week before," says Frederic Siegel, a divorce attorney with Fitzmaurice & Siegel in Stanford, Conn. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:22 pm
Siegel, --- So.2d ----, 2007 WL 2710957 (Fla. 4th DCA Sep 19, 2007). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
Siegel that speaks directly to this question. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:56 am
The equality arguments summarized by Professor Reva Siegel and Professor Neil Siegel (and here by just RS) recognize a "bona fide interest in protecting potential life. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm
I weigh in on this matter because Randy Barnett provocatively reaches the exact opposite conclusion relying, in part, on my scholarship. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:26 am
If the best interpretation of the Constitution requires a certain kind of judicial review, then judicial review is appropriate as a matter of judicial duty. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
As Linda Greenhouse and Reva Siegel argue in a recent post, Casey and Carhart require more of a court that is duty bound to subject abortion restrictions to judicial review.The Fifth Circuit’s opinion also appears dubious from a federal courts perspective. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:30 pm
The plaintiffs, Robert Voelker, Nancy Lund, and Liesa Montag-Siegel outside of the Lewis F. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:20 am
As a result, starting in 1999, using Section 302 of the Copyright Act, Siegel’s heirs recaptured his rights to the Superman character. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
(Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel point out that the case can—and should—be read more narrowly to exclude only some pregnancy discrimination, but unfortunately, that is not how courts have read it since.)Geduldig’s vision of social reality divided the world not between men and women but—I am not making this up— between “pregnant and non-pregnant persons. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Jill LeporeIn May 1923, weeks after the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm
Siegel, 407 F.2d 433, 439 (3d Cir. 1969). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:33 am
As a result, as Jonathan Siegel puts it, “[w]e are all textualists now compared with the 1960s and 1970s. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:04 am
One of the things that is different about the constitutional law casebook that I have the honor to co-edit, in its present version with Jack, Akhil Amar, and Riva Siegel (though I remain eternally grateful to Paul Brest for his original vision and kindness in asking me to join him in the second edition), is that it includes hefty excerpts from the Lincoln-Douglas debates. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 9:56 am
Siegel, 290 F.3d 118 (2d Cir. 2002), and Guerrero v. [read post]
