Search for: "Matter of Skinner" Results 41 - 60 of 324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2011, 8:03 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court halted the sentence and agreed to hear a matter in Skinner’s case.In March of this year, the justices ruled that Skinner had the right to sue a Texas district attorney under a federal civil rights law for refusing to allow him access to evidence for DNA testing. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:28 am by brian
The court's decision resolves conflicting rulings on the matter handed down by various of the nation's 12 circuit courts of appeals. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Lawyers on both sides have completed all of the filings in the case on that issue, so the Court is expected to schedule it for Conference within a matter of weeks. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:38 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Prosecutors will have to test everything, no matter what the cost," Mitchell told the court. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 1:27 am by Jack Bogdanski
 But come the new year, I'm afraid nothing the Democrats in Congress say or do is going to matter much. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm by Mary A. Fischer
The fact that the Supreme Court has granted Skinner’s request for a final review of this matter provides an excellent opportunity for the Court to affirm that once a convicted state prisoner has had an adequate opportunity to make a due process challenge to his conviction through a habeas corpus proceeding, other post-conviction proceeds are better left to the states to handle. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:11 am by Walter Reaves
I know no matter what happens it will be back again and somebody will be lucky to have them for his lawyer. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Karen Dyck
Skinner is instructive: [10] There is a lot going on as the Family Motions Coordinator, parties and their lawyers navigate their way through the typical Family Uncontested Motions melée, and not only because there are so many matters on the List. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:55 am by Federalist Society
This case presents two questions: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit wrongly denied qualified immunity to the police officers by analyzing whether the force used was supported by subsequent case decisions rather than prohibited by clearly established law at the time the force was used; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit further erred in holding the officers’ use of force was not reasonable as a matter of law when the suspect led police officers on a high-speed pursuit that began in Arkansas… [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:55 am by Federalist Society
This case presents two questions: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit wrongly denied qualified immunity to the police officers by analyzing whether the force used was supported by subsequent case decisions rather than prohibited by clearly established law at the time the force was used; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit further erred in holding the officers’ use of force was not reasonable as a matter of law when the suspect led police officers on a high-speed pursuit that began in Arkansas… [read post]