Search for: "Matter of Westfall"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 am
Trump matter, why didn’t the district court and the Second Circuit majority address the doctrine of presidential immunity? [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
Odfjell Westfal-Larsen, et. al, (the U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
Attorney Jamie Mendelson handled this matter on behalf of the government. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 10:35 am
So as a legal matter, under existing precedents on the Westfall Act, the Administration seems to be on firm ground here. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:02 pm
The United States then filed a petition for removal, as the Westfall Act permits. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:53 am
They will complement Huron Legal's expertise in e-discovery matters, and we are confident that they will be a great resource for our law department and law firm clients. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
However, to be eligible to come with the ambit of the Westfall Act the Employee must prove two things:"(1) That the Employee is a qualifying government official for purposes of the Westfall Act; and"2) That the tortious conduct in which the Employee was allegedly engaged was within the scope of the Employee's employment. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
However, to be eligible to come with the ambit of the Westfall Act the Employee must prove two things:"(1) That the Employee is a qualifying government official for purposes of the Westfall Act; and"2) That the tortious conduct in which the Employee was allegedly engaged was within the scope of the Employee's employment. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:31 am
The FBI has a policy of no tolerance where sexual harassment is concerned, and employees are encouraged to report such matters. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:43 pm
[Matter of] Westfall, 808 S.W.2d [829] at 837 [1991]; In re Disciplinary Action Against Graham, 453 N.W.2d 313, 322 (Minn.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 820 [111 S. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm
Reclaiming the “subject matter” limits on the scope of preclusion through a close reading of the statute, we show that the Westfall Act preserves the right of victims to sue individual officers as tortfeasors. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Reclaiming the “subject matter” limits on the scope of preclusion through a close reading of the statute, we show that the Westfall Act preserves the right of victims to sue individual officers as tortfeasors. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
This matter, styled United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:24 pm
Section §1447(c) provides that a case must be remanded "if … it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
Gates for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
Gates for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
The Westfall Act as an analogy. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:30 am
Common law damages suits against federal officers are said to have remained routinely available until after Bivens was decided when, in the 1988 Westfall Act, Congress barred state-law tort suits against federal officers acting within the scope of their employment.Through case studies of litigation against federal officers involved in customs enforcement and maritime seizures, this Essay qualifies and revises these claims. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 5:27 am
Westfall v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:24 am
First, Judge Huvelle addressed Westfall immunity. [read post]
