Search for: "Matter of Will of Smith" Results 201 - 220 of 10,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2024, 12:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  [W]hat matters is ‘how consumers actually behave—how they perceive advertising and how they make decisions. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The plaintiff is a non-denominational Church located at 17 Smith Street in Kings County. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:38 pm by Matthew Loughran
Within the firm’s Life Sciences Health Industry Group a group of experts who focus on FDA regulatory matters — Emily L. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:26 am by Amy Howe
Smith went to the Supreme Court later that month, asking the justices to weigh in on Trump’s immunity without waiting for the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:54 pm by Will Newman
  Under English law, they had jurisdiction over family law disputes and matters of inheritance. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
New Jersey AG: Hey Smith & Wesson, nice-looking documents you got there, mind if we take a look? [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:40 am by Brittany Bromell
Last Friday, the United States Supreme Court decided Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
  And so Justice Thomas, also not surprisingly, declined to join in Part III, and instead repeated his frequently stated views on the matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am by Phil Dixon
The Smith decision clarifies that the use of a non-testifying analyst’s testimonial report is offered for the truth of the matter asserted when used by a substitute analyst as the basis of their opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 7:23 pm by Adam Klasfeld
  As he had on Monday, Smith sat behind the prosecution table during the proceedings. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Scalia also wrote Smith and favored Chevron. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:04 pm by Shawn Dominy
The majority opinion in Smith concluded the non-testifying analyst’s notes and report were offered for the truth of the matter asserted:  the items were methamphetamine, marijuana, and cannabis. [read post]