Search for: "Matter of Will of Smith" Results 261 - 280 of 10,892
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2024, 10:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Olson as a policy matter: it is impossible to separate criminal prosecution from political accountability. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Beck of the Reed Smith law firm in Philadelphia for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  The statement “Mr Smith is a disgrace”, although evaluative, fails to identify what the remark is about. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:01 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
(Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images) The post The Kid Who Tracked Elon Musk’s Jet is Now Tracking Taylor Swift’s Jet, and Taylor is Seeing Red appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by Bruce Ackerman
It is for this reason that Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Rogers (D.D.C. 1972) (noting that the Supreme Court's Graham case "made clear" that "state laws restricting aliens' power to own land … was based on obsolete premises"); Smith v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:10 pm by jonathanturley
District Judge Allen Winsor in Tallahassee appears to view the matter as dimly as I did. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
Solimino, 501 U.S. 104 (1991) “[A]dministrative estoppel is favored as a matter of general policy. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" As a practical matter, lethal injection was not an option for Smith, whom the state attempted to execute using that method in 2022. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
" The Amars explained that "[a]s a textual matter," the varied references to "officers of the United States" and "offices . . . under the United States" "seemingly describe[] the same stations. [read post]