Search for: "Matter of Will of Smith" Results 301 - 320 of 10,803
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Certainly, asking our judges to be respectful to litigants using other general neutral means (such as addressing a party as "Attorney Smith" or "Plaintiff Smith") does not force anyone to violate their beliefs. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Smith reviewed the chart and served a follow-up request seeking "[t]he investigation report, adjudication decision, and appeal decision … with student names redacted, but genders indicated," for four misconduct matters identified in the chart, as well as any "related" matters. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Certainly, asking our judges to be respectful to litigants using other general neutral means (such as addressing a party as “Attorney Smith” or “Plaintiff Smith”) does not force anyone to violate their beliefs.Justice Bolden concurring said in part:Some commenters have raised First Amendment concerns, arguing that the amendment compels speech and/or infringes upon religious liberty. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
DACA’s most outspoken political opponents have also seemed mostly preoccupied by other matters. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
No matter what a person’s reason for supporting this legislation, it’s critical for our own collective humanity. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Ammi Rogers (LC)Is there value in exploring centuries-old legal historical accounts in the assessment of contemporary legal matters? [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
First, to determine whether a partnership formed, courts “must consider whether the parties expressly or implicitly intended to become partners” (Hammond v Smith, 151 AD3d 1896 [4th Dept 2017]). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 2:44 am by Seán Binder
” Trump responded online by accusing Smith’s team of misconduct, posting, “They won’t allow me to SPEAK? [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” How to react to this kind of implausible recasting of the charged crime of election interference into a constitutional matter of individual rights? [read post]