Search for: "Matter of Yaccarino"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2023, 1:35 pm
If Yaccarino is wrong — "Not a single authentic user on X saw IBM’s, Comcast’s, or Oracle’s ads next to the content in Media Matters’ article" — then there should be a counterclaim of defamation. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
Sources familiar with the matter told The Wall Street Journal that Twitter has resumed payments to Google after "consistently" dodging bills that sometimes racked up to more than $20 million a month. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:49 am
Content Moderation Matters All of this is to say that content moderation matters. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:59 pm
This latest X advertiser scare followed two Media Matters reports of ads appearing next to antisemitic content. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:50 am
Enlarge (credit: NurPhoto / Contributor | NurPhoto) Throughout Twitter's rebrand into X, advertisers have started becoming more confident using the platform, CEO Linda Yaccarino recently told CNBC. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:15 am
See In re Yaccarino, 101 N.J. 342, 385 (1985) (noting that in the absence of unusual or emergent conditions, “such ex parte communications are impermissible. [read post]
