Search for: "Matters v. Manufacturers Trust Co" Results 1 - 20 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Liability Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 495-97 (6th Cir. 2005); Stark v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  Wife puts New Baby’s carseat in the front seat, and plows into a telephone pole (or something else, it really doesn't matter). [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:38 pm
[…] Section 101 reads: “Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, . . . may obtain a patent therefor. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 8:07 pm by Shane Cortesi
A good starting place to discuss the evolution of the patentable subject matter requirement is the landmark 1998 decision State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
Thus, the unavoidably unsafe concept is inherently incompatible with the concept of design defect because no matter what their design they are “incapable of being made safe.”Then there’s the question of scope.  [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 |… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, the scope of the work it performed under the 2008 retainer agreement, which included not only numerous contracts and negotiations but also employment litigation in the U.K., makes it at least reasonable to construe the agreement as authorizing plaintiff to represent Luxury and Hoeksema in the underlying loan action (see Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 68 NY2d 172, 177 [1986] [where there is ambiguity in… [read post]