Search for: "Matthew Waxman" Results 41 - 60 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 1:40 pm by RatnerPrestia
Valley Forge, PA | May 2014 – RatnerPrestia is pleased to announce that James Matthew Gould has joined their Valley Forge, PA office as Counsel. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Waxman, Regulating Resort to Force: Form and Substance of the UN Charter Regime Olivier Corten, Regulating Resort to Force: A Response to Matthew Waxman from a ‘Bright-Liner’ Paul W. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:19 pm by David Priess
Contents: Chapter One: "NATO and War Powers: Remembering the ‘Great Debate’ of the 1950s," Matthew Waxman Chapter Two: "Saving NATO," Scott R. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 4:34 am by Anushka Limaye
Jen Patja Howell posted an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes sat down with Paul Rosenzweig to discuss investigating presidents: Matthew Waxman reviewed Michael Beschloss’s new book, “Presidents of War. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Abstract here.At the Washington Post's Made by History: Stony Brook University's George Aumoithe on the racist history of why some communities don't have enough ICU beds.Over at Lawfare: Columbia Law's Matthew Waxman on Eisenhower and War Powers. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 7:02 am by Stewart Baker
In it, Matthew Waxman, Liviu Librescu Professor of Law at Columbia University, and I talk to Yuval Shany, a noted Israeli human rights expert and professor at Hebrew University. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:12 am by Benjamin Wittes
All of this discussion of the relevant standard of proof brings me, finally, to two papers by Matthew Waxman, which deal richly with the subject. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:00 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) Law and Ethics for Robot Soldiers is the title of a new essay by Matthew Waxman and me; it will appear in Policy Review down the road, but we have posted to SSRN an annotated and footnoted version that we hope will be useful to students, researchers, and scholars. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by Benjamin Wittes
Brookings has posted my written statement, which I prepared with Bobby and Matthew Waxman of Columbia Law School. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:55 am by Jack Goldsmith
A few weeks ago Matthew Waxman and I ended our critical essay on President Obama’s war powers legacy by noting that “Obama’s legacy will look quite different if, after the midterm elections, he seeks and receives congressional authorization for the use of force against IS, especially if he also works with Congress on a framework statute that updates the 2001 AUMF to deal with the many emerging threats around the world in a principled, transparent manner with… [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 1:42 pm by Lev Sugarman
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Matthew Waxman continued his series on the historical development of war powers, reflecting on President Eisenhower's 1957 congressional use of force authorization in the Middle East. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:28 am by Benjamin Wittes
I spent the last two days at a terrific conference in at Columbia Law School on asymmetric warfare and the laws of armed conflict, organized by Matthew Waxman and the great Stanford international relations scholar, Steve Krasner. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Matthew Waxman, Columbia Law School, on "Remembering the Selective Draft Law Cases" (Lawfare). [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Hughes, 1916 by Matthew Waxman (Lawfare). [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 5:39 pm by David Priess, Tia Sewell
Hughes, 1916,” Matthew Waxman Chapter Five: “The State Laws That May Decide a Disputed 2020 Election,” Richard Altieri, Scott R. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
”  The conference is free and open to the public and sponsored by Princeton's Program in Law and Public Affairs.Over at Lawfare: Matthew Waxman, Columbia Law, on The Mexican-American War and Constitutional War Powers. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 7:28 am by Scott R. Anderson, Matthew Waxman
One of us, Matthew Waxman, then writes to express doubts about the likely efficacy of—and need for—statutory war powers reform. [read post]