Search for: "Matthews v. Little" Results 1 - 20 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2021, 6:19 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Facts not in evidence A jury in the Circuit Court for Carroll County convicted Matthew A. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am by Sherry F. Colb
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This means that if the federal judges (who interpret the Constitution every day) know in their heart of hearts that the defendant did not get a fair trial, they have to sustain the conviction if "fairminded jurists could disagree" about the state court's proper application of constitutional precedent.The case is Matthews v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 11:41 am by Michelle Yeary
  But, we did mention a third case – Matthews v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am by Matthew Pinsker
Matthew Pinsker is Associate Professor of History at Dickinson College. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:59 am by ZMan!
v=kEfJpJ1lhQc Video Link "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
So they win that prong of the three-part due process analysis under Matthews v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 2:33 pm by Dave
  While Bristol Combined Court was flooded, HHJ Matthews, an academic judge, heard and gave judgment (at the Rolls Building) in two proprietary estoppel cases of note: James v James [2018] EWHC 43, and Smyth-Tyrrell v Bowden [2018] EWHC 106 (ch). [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
At that time, the Attorney General had ignited controversy by invoking a little-known power under section 53 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Becerra: Ninth Circuit errs on individual gun rights, SCOTUS should correct [Shapiro and Matthew LaRosiere] Assuming patents = property, structure of Patent Trial and Appeal Board may flunk constitutionally required norms of judicial independence [Shapiro and Barnes on Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]