Search for: "Mattox v. United States" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2016, 3:28 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
United States, 146 U.S. 140 (1892), because the court improperly limited its inquiry to whether the external contact amounted to a 'communication' and did not investigate the prejudicial effect of the police tail. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:54 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(2) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil case, [for] a statement that the declarant, while believing the declarant’s death to be imminent, made about its... [read post]