Search for: "Mattox v. United States" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2016, 3:28 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
United States, 146 U.S. 140 (1892), because the court improperly limited its inquiry to whether the external contact amounted to a 'communication' and did not investigate the prejudicial effect of the police tail. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:54 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(2) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil case, [for] a statement that the declarant, while believing the declarant’s death to be imminent, made about its... [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:53 pm
In Georgia, and indeed throughout the United States, we take jury duty seriously. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Wilson, and Mattox, Mattox & Wilson ("the Law Firm") (collectively, "the Lawyers") on his legal malpractice claim. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:55 am
Shortly afterwards, the profile was deleted by MySpace.As you would expect a judge to know, parodies of public officials are protected free speech under the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]