Search for: "Maxwell v. Maxwell" Results 1 - 20 of 720
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Unfortunately, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Maxwell v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:24 am by sally
Revenue and Customs Comrs v Maxwell and another [2010] EWCA Civ 1379; [2010] WLR (D) 219 “The amount of a creditor’s claim against a company in administration and the characterisation of the company’s debt to the creditor were to be assessed under r 2.38(4) and (5) of the Insolvency Rules 1986 at the date of the administration, not the date of the creditors’ meeting, but the chairman’s powers of quantification under rr 2.39(1) and (3) and 2.38(5) were… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:17 pm
Despite these circumstances, the trial judge never doubted Maxwell’s competence. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 12:02 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Photo identification Convicted of robbery, after the entry of a conditional guilty plea, in the Circuit Court for Cecil County, James Edward Maxwell, III, appellant, raises a single issue on appeal: whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress what he claims was an ... [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Green, in Scotland and Sweet & Maxwell Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 8:16 am by Family Law
Maxwell (Washburn University School of Law) has published A Child Can Have Two Mothers: Frazier v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm
 According to the Court of Appeal, here's what plaintiff -- who filed in pro per -- said about the relevant contract:"Maxwell alleged that Dolezal had used his photograph and his website, JordanMaxwell.com, without Maxwell’s authorization or consent and for the purposes of advertising and/or soliciting purchases of merchandise. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:43 am by sally
Regina v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48; [2011] WLR (D) 238 “When the Court of Appeal quashed a conviction and then exercised its discretion under section 7 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 to order a retrial of the defendant, that decision should not be upset on appeal unless it could be shown that it was plainly wrong in that it was one which no reasonable court could have made or that it took into account immaterial factors or failed to consider material factors. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:20 am by sally
Regina (Maxwell) v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2011] EWCA Civ 1236; [2011] WLR (D) 307 “Although a complaint of disability discrimination was an eligible complaint to be made to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (“OIA”) under the Higher Education Act 2004, the task and duty of the OIA on a complaint of disability discrimination against a higher education institution was confined to whether the conduct of… [read post]