Search for: "May v. Board of Directors"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2022, 12:15 am
In Borer v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:43 am
Although this group of individuals may be referred to as an advisory board, this “board” is not synonymous with the type of “board” that constitutes the board of directors. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:15 am
See Lippman v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 9:00 am
Kill, C.A. 12251-VCL (May 19, 2016) This is an excellent review of the law governing when the Court will enjoin board action that affects the ability of stockholders to elect directors. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:25 pm
In Crest v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 6:27 pm
Emmerich, Sabastian V. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:19 am
The May 3, 2011 Tax Court of Canada decision in Snively v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 6:29 pm
The board may designate 1 or more directors as alternate members of any committee . . . [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm
White v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:45 am
The recent decision of Park Employees and Retirement Board Employees’ Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 1:02 pm
Miller and Rhoads v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 6:31 am
See the case of Ontvanger v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:03 am
In Scheenstra v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
In keeping with longstanding Delaware precedent, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held that it may void an action by a board of directors – even where the action is not otherwise in violation of the corporate charter or the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) – when equity so requires. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Schoon has established that companies may amend their by-laws and retroactively eliminate indemnity protection for former directors. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 1:33 pm
Recently, the Delaware Court of Chancery in Pfeiffer v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Jorgl v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:00 am
Hogan, C.A. 11900-VCL (June 10, 2016) Under the famous Zapata decision, a board of directors may take control of a derivative case, provided it meets the test set out in that opinion. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
In Metcalf v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
This decision indicates, however, that the same may not hold true for former directors who do not challenge their removal as directors and who seek documents for reasons unrelated to their prior board service. [read post]
