Search for: "May v. Maples et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
Chicago Transit Authority, et al. 08 L 4878, remind us that injuries can result from the activities we engage in on a daily basis. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 1:53 pm
In Sociedad Agricola Santa Teresa Ltda. et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Ville de Montréal (Service de police de la Ville de Montréal), 2018 QCCS 5639 [23] En raison de la position prise par la Ville de Montréal dès le début du dossier et de son comportement depuis, la présente demande en irrecevabilité est manifestement mal fondée, déraisonnable et abusive au sens de l’article 54 C.p.c.[11]. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
Amicus brief of National Association of Legal Investigators et al. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
On April 1, 2015, the Court of Appeals decided the case of Maple Drive Farms Limited Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:32 pm
Their petition (Cao, et al., v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am
Esseghaier, et al., 2019 ONCA 672; 2020 SCC(38861) The Chief Justice: “The Court is of the view that the curative proviso at s. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
Billing, et al. (05-1157, petition here). [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:30 am
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of Texas State Senator Rodney Ellis et al. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
Billing, et al. (05-1157, petition here). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Washington (2004).Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Maples v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
ET, Robert Ambrogi will be hosting a panel on Online Dispute Resolution for the Massachusetts Bar Association. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Second Taylor Wessing Global IP Index reviews 24 places to litigate patents (PatLit) Discussion of ‘IFI Patent Intelligence Analysis of 2008’s Top US-Patent Recipients Suggests America May be Losing Dominance: Companies Outside the U.S. [read post]
