Search for: "May v. Mulligan" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 11:28 am by Chuck Becker
As a result, EPA has decided that it will solicit comments until May 16, 2011, for anyone who wants to be heard. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:18 am by SHG
The Supremes will hear oral argument today in Renico v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:54 am by Yvonne Daly
A decision was handed down by the High Court yesterday in the case of Mulligan v Governer of Portlaoise Prison, which, as noted here before, involved a claim for damages from a former prisoner of Portlaoise Prison based on the assertion that the practice of “slopping out” was humiliating, degrading, and in breach of his constitutional and human rights. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
If your personal injury lawyer instructs you not to file a claim with your health insurer concerning your medical care, you may instead be in the hands of a “lien doctor” [Sara Randazzo, WSJ, paywall] Supreme Court passes up opportunity to decide whether the Constitution’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to business defendants, and also whether a state can conjure an excessive fine out of existence by conceptually slicing it up into smaller daily fines [Ilya Shapiro on… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R v Waya, heard 5 May 2011. [read post]
21 May 2009, 8:21 am
Plaintiff attempts to take a mulligan with this argument; however, this shot also lands in the drink. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 11:26 am
This can be a particular problem with consent orders, where the form of words, being a compromise negotiated by the parties rather than imposed by a trial judge, may be understood by each side to have a different meaning.Incidentally the IPKat, who is not a golfer, had not the faintest clue what "take a mulligan" means and had to resort to wikipedia for clarification. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:37 am by Greg Mersol
  It may be that the majority was giving the plaintiffs a judicial Mulligan. [read post]