Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado" Results 61 - 80 of 1,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Ilya Somin] Thoughts on the Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Trump Section 3 Case
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm by Ilya Somin
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Attending Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
But when I walked into the Supreme Court this morning, I felt a sense of closure. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Eight: The First Amendment/Right to Vote/Federalism-Based "Off-Ramp" Argument that is Likely to Carry the Day
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am by Marty Lederman
  Over the past few decades, the Supreme Court has adjudicated many cases involving state ballot exclusions and conditions, some involving restrictions on parties, other involving restrictions on particular candidates. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Case Summaries: N.C. Court of Appeals (Feb. 6, 2024)
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
Supreme Court issued Roper v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
Supreme Court Hears Trump v. Anderson: What To Expect
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
This morning I will be joining the live coverage of the Supreme Court of the arguments over the disqualification of former President Donald Trump from the Colorado ballot under the 14th Amendment. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
:@WilliamBaude: The Facts Matter, Trials Matter, The Record Matters
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
  The Colorado Supreme Court held that the trial complied with the requirements of Colorado state law and provided due process of law. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Trump v. Anderson, Professor Akhil Reed Amar, and the Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
The Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] All Blackman-Tillman Articles, Presentations, Amicus Briefs, Commentary, and Blog posts on Section 3 and Insurrection
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Nine: Ten Arguments that Petitioners Haven’t Raised (or that Trump Only Invoked Late in the Game)
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm by Marty Lederman
 “Off-Ramp” Arguments that would result in reversal of the Supreme Court of Colorado without adjudicating Trump’s eligibility that Petitioners have not raised 8. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in support of that proposition, Gorsuch cited two Supreme Court cases—Munro v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in support of that proposition, Gorsuch cited two Supreme Court cases—Munro v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: Section Three Is Not A "Political Question"
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
Anderson litigation, both the Colorado District and the Colorado Supreme Court found Section Three to be justiciable and Trump has not pressed a political question argument in his Supreme Court merits briefs. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The U.S. is no Longer a "Mature Democracy": Implications for Trump's Ballot Eligibility
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 To be sure, the Colorado Supreme Court has declared that Colorado law requires the Secretary of State to exclude Trump’s name from the presidential primary election ballot (though as I explained here, that’s not happening, either—it’s too late for that now). [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Tune into one of the most important arguments in decades: Trump v. Anderson
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
” Trump petitioned the Supreme Court after the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 applied to him, and that he had engaged in insurrection– the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
Case Establishing Strict New Jersey Test for Independent Contractor Status Finally ‎Resolved: January 2024 IC Legal News Update
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Larue v. [read post]
Independent Contractor Compliance Legal Blog - http://independentcontractorcompliance.com/
Explaining Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment case at the Supreme Court
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy
Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  Even the Colorado Supreme Court could not find evidence of any consensus view on what the term meant in 1868. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Untitled
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
  The privilege of membership in a party may be, as this Court said in Grovey v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 5 February 2024
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the court heard the defendant’s application to strike out the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited KB-2023-003818. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/